Skip to content

Add offered qos incompatible event and event executor test - #11

Merged
ivanpauno merged 6 commits into
feature/eventsfrom
ivanpauno/add-offered-qos-incompatible-event
Aug 20, 2020
Merged

Add offered qos incompatible event and event executor test#11
ivanpauno merged 6 commits into
feature/eventsfrom
ivanpauno/add-offered-qos-incompatible-event

Conversation

@ivanpauno

@ivanpaunoivanpauno commented Aug 19, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

(edit) #10 has already been merged.

This PR is build on top of #10.

It adds a new publisher event status: OfferedQosIncompatible.
That new event status is used to test the executor code in #10, which surprisingly works without changes.

There are some other cosmetic changes here.

I will rebase and redirect the PR to feature/events when #10 gets merged.

@ivanpaunoivanpauno added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 19, 2020
@ivanpaunoivanpauno self-assigned this Aug 19, 2020
Comment threadrcljava/src/test/java/org/ros2/rcljava/SpinTest.java Outdated
@jacobperron

Copy link
Copy Markdown

surprisingly works without changes.

😂

@jacobperronjacobperron left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides the minor comments above, this LGTM

Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
@ivanpauno
ivanpaunoforce-pushed the ivanpauno/add-offered-qos-incompatible-event branch from 9951769 to d7ad984CompareAugust 20, 2020 13:06
@ivanpauno
ivanpauno changed the base branch from ivanpauno/events-executor-support to feature/eventsAugust 20, 2020 13:06
@ivanpauno
ivanpauno marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2020 13:08
@ivanpauno

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

I have rebased feature/events against foxy-devel, and this branch against feature/events.
In that way, we can see CI being exercised now 😃 .

Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
@ivanpauno

ivanpauno commented Aug 20, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

@jacobperron there are some event statuses that we want but are not available in foxy (e.g. message lost), should we create a galactic-devel branch?

(edit) that should be done after completing basic event handling support in the foxy branch

@ivanpauno

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Unrelated, but I want to get rid of all stale branches.
Do we need to keep some of them or can I delete them all?

Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
@ivanpauno
ivanpauno merged commit f36782a into feature/eventsAug 20, 2020
@ivanpauno
ivanpauno deleted the ivanpauno/add-offered-qos-incompatible-event branch August 20, 2020 15:48
@jacobperron

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ivanpauno

there are some event statuses that we want but are not available in foxy (e.g. message lost), should we create a galactic-devel branch?

Yeah, feel free to create a galatic-devel branch when the time is right.

Unrelated, but I want to get rid of all stale branches.

Go ahead and delete stale branches 👍

ivanpauno added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2020
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
ivanpauno added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2021
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
ivanpauno added a commit to ros2-java/ros2_java that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2022
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
ivanpauno added a commit to ros2-java/ros2_java that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2022
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <ivanpauno@ekumenlabs.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ivanpauno@jacobperron