Streamline repr(partial object)

[Vgr255]

BPO	28062
Nosy	@rhettinger, @ncoghlan, @serhiy-storchaka, @Vgr255
Files	functools_partial_repr_1.patch

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2016-09-10.12:12:43.179>
labels = ['type-bug', 'library']
title = 'Streamline repr(partial object)'
updated_at = <Date 2016-09-10.12:40:13.692>
user = 'https://github.com/Vgr255'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2016-09-10.12:40:13.692>
actor = 'serhiy.storchaka'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2016-09-10.12:12:43.179>
creator = 'abarry'
dependencies = []
files = ['44529']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 28062
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['275628', '275632']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['rhettinger', 'ncoghlan', 'serhiy.storchaka', 'abarry']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'patch review'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'behavior'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue28062'
versions = ['Python 3.6']

Linked PRs

• gh-72249: Include the module name in the repr of partial object #101910
• gh-72249: Correct wording of GH-101910 blurb #138468
• [3.14] gh-72249: Correct wording of GH-101910 blurb (GH-138468) #138470
• [3.13] gh-72249: Correct wording of GH-101910 blurb (GH-138468) #138471

[Vgr255]

This is a followup to bpo-27137, where it was found out the repr of a partial object includes the module (i.e. 'functools') only if it's not a subclass. This behaviour is surprising at best. Attached patch streamlines the reprs of partial objects to always include the module.

Raymond, do you remember why this approach was taken? Looking at the code, it seems it was just the easiest way to go about it.

Side-note: I couldn't run the test suite since I ran into bpo-28061, so I just did manual testing.

[serhiy-storchaka]

Similar issues: bpo-27541 and bpo-21861.

[furkanonder]

The PR is ready for review. @serhiy-storchaka

[serhiy-storchaka]

Thank you for your contribution @Vgr255 and @furkanonder.

I do not think that it is worth to backport this change.