Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
Fix issubclass() to narrow down types of type variables#7930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
796f527238bfa85b35e9ddf62cbc316cca7e987e428ab0d96fe59c0dFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -3733,30 +3733,7 @@ def find_isinstance_check_helper(self, node: Expression) -> Tuple[TypeMap, TypeM | ||
| return {}, {} | ||
| expr = node.args[0] | ||
| if literal(expr) == LITERAL_TYPE: | ||
| vartype = get_proper_type(type_map[expr]) | ||
| type = get_isinstance_type(node.args[1], type_map) | ||
| if isinstance(vartype, UnionType): | ||
| union_list = [] | ||
| for t in get_proper_types(vartype.items): | ||
| if isinstance(t, TypeType): | ||
| union_list.append(t.item) | ||
| else: | ||
| # This is an error that should be reported earlier | ||
| # if we reach here, we refuse to do any type inference. | ||
| return {}, {} | ||
| vartype = UnionType(union_list) | ||
| elif isinstance(vartype, TypeType): | ||
| vartype = vartype.item | ||
| elif (isinstance(vartype, Instance) and | ||
| vartype.type.fullname == 'builtins.type'): | ||
| vartype = self.named_type('builtins.object') | ||
| else: | ||
| # Any other object whose type we don't know precisely | ||
| # for example, Any or a custom metaclass. | ||
| return {}, {} # unknown type | ||
| yes_map, no_map = conditional_type_map(expr, vartype, type) | ||
| yes_map, no_map = map(convert_to_typetype, (yes_map, no_map)) | ||
| return yes_map, no_map | ||
| return self.infer_issubclass_maps(node, expr, type_map) | ||
| elif refers_to_fullname(node.callee, 'builtins.callable'): | ||
| if len(node.args) != 1: # the error will be reported elsewhere | ||
| return {}, {} | ||
| @@ -4367,6 +4344,39 @@ def push_type_map(self, type_map: 'TypeMap') -> None: | ||
| for expr, type in type_map.items(): | ||
| self.binder.put(expr, type) | ||
| def infer_issubclass_maps(self, node: CallExpr, | ||
| expr: Expression, | ||
| type_map: Dict[Expression, Type] | ||
| ) -> Tuple[TypeMap, TypeMap]: | ||
Member There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Please add a short docstring for the new function. | ||
| """Infer type restrictions for an expression in issubclass call.""" | ||
| vartype = type_map[expr] | ||
| type = get_isinstance_type(node.args[1], type_map) | ||
| if isinstance(vartype, TypeVarType): | ||
| vartype = vartype.upper_bound | ||
| vartype = get_proper_type(vartype) | ||
| if isinstance(vartype, UnionType): | ||
| union_list = [] | ||
| for t in get_proper_types(vartype.items): | ||
| if isinstance(t, TypeType): | ||
| union_list.append(t.item) | ||
| else: | ||
| # This is an error that should be reported earlier | ||
| # if we reach here, we refuse to do any type inference. | ||
| return {}, {} | ||
| vartype = UnionType(union_list) | ||
| elif isinstance(vartype, TypeType): | ||
| vartype = vartype.item | ||
| elif (isinstance(vartype, Instance) and | ||
| vartype.type.fullname == 'builtins.type'): | ||
| vartype = self.named_type('builtins.object') | ||
| else: | ||
| # Any other object whose type we don't know precisely | ||
| # for example, Any or a custom metaclass. | ||
| return {}, {} # unknown type | ||
| yes_map, no_map = conditional_type_map(expr, vartype, type) | ||
| yes_map, no_map = map(convert_to_typetype, (yes_map, no_map)) | ||
| return yes_map, no_map | ||
| def conditional_type_map(expr: Expression, | ||
| current_type: Optional[Type], | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -6512,3 +6512,36 @@ def access_after_declaration(self) -> None: | ||
| reveal_type(x) # N: Revealed type is 'builtins.int' | ||
| x = x + 1 | ||
| [case testIsSubClassNarrowDownTypesOfTypeVariables] | ||
| from typing import Type, TypeVar, Generic | ||
| class Base: | ||
| field: int = 42 | ||
| TypeT = TypeVar("TypeT", bound=type) | ||
| TypeT1 = TypeVar("TypeT1", bound=Type[Base]) | ||
TH3CHARLie marked this conversation as resolved.
Uh oh!There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. | ||
| class C1: | ||
| def method(self, other: type) -> int: | ||
| if issubclass(other, Base): | ||
| reveal_type(other) # N: Revealed type is 'Type[__main__.Base]' | ||
| return other.field | ||
ilevkivskyi marked this conversation as resolved.
Uh oh!There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. | ||
| return 0 | ||
| class C2(Generic[TypeT]): | ||
| def method(self, other: TypeT) -> int: | ||
| if issubclass(other, Base): | ||
| reveal_type(other) # N: Revealed type is 'Type[__main__.Base]' | ||
| return other.field | ||
| return 0 | ||
| class C3(Generic[TypeT1]): | ||
| def method(self, other: TypeT1) -> int: | ||
| if issubclass(other, Base): | ||
| reveal_type(other) # N: Revealed type is 'TypeT1`1' | ||
| return other.field | ||
| return 0 | ||
| [builtins fixtures/isinstancelist.pyi] | ||
Member There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. OK, now the two classes don't look the same, but you didn't do what I asked, I wanted type variables with different upper bounds, like | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would keep the above two lines in this function. To make the refactoring more 1-to-1.