Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup of 5 pull requests - #102254
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…jackh726 implied_bounds: deal with inference vars fixesrust-lang#101951 while computing implied bounds for `<<T as ConstructionFirm>::Builder as BuilderFn<'_>>::Output` normalization replaces a projection with an inference var (adding a `Projection` obligation). Until we prove that obligation, this inference var remains unknown, which caused us to miss an implied bound necessary to prove that the unnormalized projection from the trait method signature is wf. r? types
…andry Resolve async fn signature even without body (e.g., in trait) Fixesrust-lang#102138 This "bail if no body" behavior was introduced in rust-lang#69539 to fixrust-lang#69401, but that ICE does not reproduce any more. The error message changes a bit, but that's all, and I don't think it's a particularly diagnostic bad regression.
…notriddle rustdoc: Stabilize --diagnostic-width This stabilizes the `--diagnostic-width` flag for rustdoc. This flag was stabilized in rustc in rust-lang#95635, but it isn't clear from the discussion there why it wasn't stabilized in rustdoc. I believe this flag works as expected, following the same behavior as rustc. I'd like to stabilize this so that the same support can be stabilized in cargo, and it would help simplify things if both rustc and rustdoc supported it.
matthiaskrgr
commented
Sep 25, 2022
MemberAuthor
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
commented
Sep 25, 2022
Collaborator
bors
commented
Sep 25, 2022
Collaborator
bors
commented
Sep 25, 2022
Collaborator
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Sep 25, 2022
Collaborator
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR: previous master: 8e9c93df46 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
rust-timer
commented
Sep 25, 2022
Collaborator
Finished benchmarking commit (6f6010b): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Footnotes |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#main-content > .line-numbers#102240 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS#main-content > .line-numbers).summary#102242 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS.summary)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup