Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Rollup of 8 pull requests - #110295
Conversation
Stick `#[rustc_nounwind]` to all except `const_eval_select` to undo the change for all other intrinsics.
with repect to other dead code lints
- remove unused (pun intentional) `continue` - improve wording with assoc items in general
…jyn514 Fix diff option conflict in UI test Trivial fix for test case `tests/run-make/rustdoc-verify-output-files`, it's failing on MacOS, the `-u` option specifies the unified context format, while the `-q` option specifies only brief output. These two options are incompatible, since the unified context format produces a more detailed output than the brief output format.
…r=WaffleLapkin Check for body owner fallibly in error reporting Sometimes the "body id" we use for an obligation cause is not actually a body owner, like when we're doing WF checking on items. Fixesrust-lang#110157
Make rust-intrinsic ABI unwindable Fixrust-lang#104451, fixrust-lang/miri#2839 r? `@RalfJung`
…, r=cjgillot
Added diagnostic for pin! macro in addition to Box::pin if Unpin isn't implemented
I made a PR earlier, but accidentally renamed a branch and that deleted the PR... sorry for the duplicate
Currently, if an operation on `Pin<T>` is performed that requires `T` to implement `Unpin`, the diagnostic suggestion is to use `Box::pin` ("note: consider using `Box::pin`").
This PR suggests pin! as well, as that's another valid way of pinning a value, and avoids a heap allocation. Appropriate diagnostic suggestions were included to highlight the difference in semantics (local pinning for pin! vs non-local for Box::pin).
Fixesrust-lang#109964Automatically update the LLVM submodule for musl target (and other places) Fixesrust-lang#109987
…r=lcnr dead-code-lint: de-dup multiple unused assoc functions Fixesrust-lang#109600 Prior art: rust-lang#97853
…ment, r=bjorn3 Only emit alignment checks if we have a panic_impl Fixesrust-lang#109996 r? `@bjorn3` because you commented that this situation could impact you as well
… r=oli-obk Implement `Copy` for `LocationDetail` micro-nano-little-change
matthiaskrgr
commented
Apr 13, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2023
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2023
bors
commented
Apr 13, 2023
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 13, 2023
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR: previous master: e4dae0dac7 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
rust-timer
commented
Apr 14, 2023
Finished benchmarking commit (a41fc00): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
|
Successful merges:
CopyforLocationDetail#110291 (ImplementCopyforLocationDetail)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup