Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
rc,sync: Do not create references to uninitialized values - #119433
Conversation
RalfJung
commented
Dec 30, 2023
Sorry, I can't review libs changes. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Noratrieb
commented
Jan 21, 2024
Even if it's decided to not be UB, I think this still makes the code nicer. Thanks! |
bors
commented
Jan 21, 2024
rc,sync: Do not create references to uninitialized values Closesrust-lang#119241 r? `@RalfJung`
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119433 (rc,sync: Do not create references to uninitialized values) - rust-lang#119460 (coverage: Never emit improperly-ordered coverage regions) - rust-lang#119766 (Split tait and impl trait in assoc items logic) - rust-lang#120160 (Manually implement derived `NonZero` traits.) - rust-lang#120177 (Remove duplicate dependencies for rustc) - rust-lang#120183 (Add `#[coverage(off)]` to closures introduced by `#[test]` and `#[bench]`) - rust-lang#120185 (coverage: Don't instrument `#[automatically_derived]` functions) - rust-lang#120201 (Bump some deps with syn 1.0 dependencies) - rust-lang#120246 (Re-add estebank to review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
commented
Jan 23, 2024
bors
commented
Jan 23, 2024
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Jan 23, 2024
Finished benchmarking commit (dfe53af): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 662.447s -> 662.823s (0.06%) |
Closes#119241
r? @RalfJung