Skip to content

Rollup of 4 pull requests - #147657

Closed
chenyukang wants to merge 23 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
chenyukang:rollup-d716p6a
Closed

Rollup of 4 pull requests#147657
chenyukang wants to merge 23 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
chenyukang:rollup-d716p6a

Conversation

@chenyukang

@chenyukangchenyukang commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

lcnrand others added 23 commits October 2, 2025 12:09
we should not get the certainty from the current result of the
provisional cache entry
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
fix 2 search graph bugs
wooooooooops, i should really run the fuzzer even when not changing the structure of the search graph as a whole :3 fixes the `ml-kem` ICE in the next-solver crater run
r? `@BoxyUwU`
…=joshtriplett
Implement fs api set_times and set_times_nofollow
implementation of rust-lang#147455
r? `@joshtriplett`
…etrochenkov
`proc_macro` cleanups (3/N)
Followup to rust-lang#147386, which removed the old `Decode` trait.
Can be reviewed commit by commit.
std: implement `pal::os::exit` for VEXos
This PR provides a more "proper" implementation of process exiting in VEXos programs by going through `vexSystemExitRequest` rather than calling `intrinsics::abort`, which exits using an undefined instruction trap. This matches the existing implementation of `rt::abort_internal` and therefore makes `std::process::exit` have the same behavior as returning from main on VEXos targets.
@rustbotrustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 14, 2025
@chenyukang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors

bors commented Oct 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit e950a60 has been approved by chenyukang

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 14, 2025
@Zalathar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There are 2 more rollup=never PRs waiting in the queue, and also there are currently about 8 PRs that could be rolled up (including rollup=iffy ones, which tend to get starved if people leave them out of rollups).

So it might be a good idea to close this small rollup, and either make a rollup of everything, or let the rollup=never PRs run for a bit and then do a larger rollup later.

What do you think?

@chenyukang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Sure.
Seems I didn't see so many PR approved when creating the Rollup PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rollupA PR which is a rollupS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.T-libsRelevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.WG-trait-system-refactorThe Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@chenyukang@bors@Zalathar@rustbot@lcnr@joshtriplett@cyrgani@tropicaaal