Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
TRPL: ownership, borrowing, and lifetimes - #24782
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 24, 2015
Contributor
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you mean "every reference has some lifetime associated with it"?
steveklabnik
commented
Apr 28, 2015
ContributorAuthor
Nits addressed. |
steveklabnikforce-pushed
the
doc_ownership
branch
from
April 28, 2015 17:45
17fbdda to
2b30cc6CompareContributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/zero cost abstraction/zero-cost abstraction/
nikomatsakis
commented
May 5, 2015
Contributor
@steveklabnik r+ from me. I read it over and mostly thought it seemed good. There are some details (like returning references, notably) that are not really covered, perhaps those are better left to specific guides though. |
nikomatsakis
commented
May 5, 2015
Contributor
I agree with the missing |
Also, as @huonw guessed, move semantics really _does_ make more sense as a sub-chapter of ownership.
steveklabnik
commented
May 5, 2015
ContributorAuthor
@bors: r=nikomatsakis rollup |
bors
commented
May 5, 2015
Collaborator
📌 Commit ab3cb8c has been approved by |
steveklabnik
commented
May 5, 2015
ContributorAuthor
Yeah, adding more complicated stuff in the future is certainly important. |
steveklabnik added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2015
…atsakis Also, as @huonw guessed, move semantics really _does_ make more sense as a sub-chapter of ownership.
steveklabnik added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2015
…atsakis Also, as @huonw guessed, move semantics really _does_ make more sense as a sub-chapter of ownership.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also, as @huonw guessed, move semantics really does make more sense as
a sub-chapter of ownership.