Skip to content

Rollup of 17 pull requests - #25731

Closed
oli-obk wants to merge 17 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
oli-obk:rollup
Closed

Rollup of 17 pull requests#25731
oli-obk wants to merge 17 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
oli-obk:rollup

Conversation

@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@oli-obk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

sorry about that :/ i thought it'd create that branch in my repos only. well, now that it's done I'm at least running make check

@oli-obk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

stage1 passes

@oli-obk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

make check passes

@steveklabnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors: r+ p=1

@bors

bors commented May 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 251481f has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors: r-

@steveklabnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wait a minute, why does this have 17 PRs when theres only seven in the queue that are open?

@oli-obk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

there are some that are already merged

@oli-obk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

oh + the rollup PRs

@steveklabnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

are you on IRC? I'm confused.

@oli-obk
oli-obkforce-pushed the rollup branch 2 times, most recently from 2b803dc to 882af3fCompareMay 23, 2015 16:37
steveklabnikand others added 16 commits May 23, 2015 18:37
Also, when checking for common gendered words elsewhere, I found one 'he', moved to 'they' as well.
rust-lang#25640 (comment)
Took me a moment to figure out that the appropriate response to
"need program file" was to install the program named "file", not
to think "If I didn't need the program file, why would I be
compiling things?".
The `run` function passed its argument to `msg` via `"$@"`, but `msg`
only printed its first argument. I think the intention was for `msg` to
print all its arguments. (If not, `run` should only `msg "$1"`.)
There are more possible optimizations left (cached length in loops) as
well as some possible bugs (shadowed variables) to fix. This is mostly
syntactic.
I consider that this version has a better reading fluency, instead of having a period between clauses
@oli-obkoli-obk closed this May 23, 2015
@oli-obk
oli-obk deleted the rollup branch May 23, 2015 16:46
@CentrilCentril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rollupA PR which is a rollup

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

16 participants

@oli-obk@rust-highfive@steveklabnik@bors@Centril@huonw@tamird@tshepang@mbrubeck@geofft@killercup@eddyb@Manishearth@MatejLach@brianquinlan@0xcpu