Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Cargo lock tidy check - #33404
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
May 4, 2016
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
gsquire
commented
May 4, 2016
alexcrichton
commented
May 4, 2016
tamird
commented
May 4, 2016
as mentioned in the original PR, it may be worth printing the diff in addition to emitting an opaque failure |
Cargo lock tidy check A rebased PR for rust-lang#32901
bors
commented
May 8, 2016
⌛ Testing commit b3de042 with merge 3aeea59... |
Cargo lock tidy check A rebased PR for rust-lang#32901
bors
commented
May 8, 2016
⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request. |
petrochenkov
commented
May 27, 2016
This doesn't work on Windows/MSYS2 for some reason, for example in #33794 |
A rebased PR for #32901