Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
proc macros 1.1: improve diagnostics - #38792
Conversation
brson
commented
Jan 3, 2017
What do proc macro errors look like after this? |
jseyfried
commented
Jan 4, 2017
@brson After this PR, these errors will look like other errors in |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 4, 2017
@jseyfried can we generate a |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 4, 2017
Marking as beta-accepted: small diff, important for macros 1.1 usability. |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 4, 2017
r=me, but ideally with a ui test |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 4, 2017
@bors: p=1 (for when this is approved, we'll want to backport) |
fd532a1 to
c0bcf5dComparejseyfried
commented
Jan 6, 2017
Added a |
bors
commented
Jan 6, 2017
📌 Commit c0bcf5d has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 6, 2017
⌛ Testing commit c0bcf5d with merge 119ac4b... |
bors
commented
Jan 6, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 6, 2017
@jseyfried test fails :( |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 6, 2017
c0bcf5d to
fd532a1Comparejseyfried
commented
Jan 6, 2017
@alexcrichton Thanks! |
bors
commented
Jan 6, 2017
📌 Commit fd532a1 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 6, 2017
bors
commented
Jan 6, 2017
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Fixes#38586.
r? @nrc