Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Test for appropriate span on second custom derive - #38607
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Dec 25, 2016
r? @brson (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
4cfe8af to
dfb6ae6Comparepetrochenkov
commented
Jan 1, 2017
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Jan 1, 2017
📌 Commit dfb6ae6 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jan 1, 2017
⌛ Testing commit dfb6ae6 with merge 0fbeada... |
bors
commented
Jan 1, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
…nkov Test for appropriate span on second custom derive Adds test for and closesrust-lang#36935.
estebank
commented
Jan 4, 2017
Has there been a change in how |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 4, 2017
Currently the ui test suite is not configured to have librustc available when it runs, so proc-macro tests in the ui test suite aren't guaranteed to work. Rustbuild is nondeterministic in how it lays out steps, so that may explain why it worked locally. If we really want to add this test as a ui test then the suite needs to be moved below like the other "fulldeps" suites. |
…nkov Test for appropriate span on second custom derive Adds test for and closesrust-lang#36935.
estebank
commented
Jan 8, 2017
@alexcrichton I'm trying to figure out why I needed to remove the ui assertion from the |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 9, 2017
@estebank no worries that's ok. You can actually change the assertion to testing that it's not present instead of testing that it's present. That basically means that we only run the tests for hosts, not targets (which is correct) |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 9, 2017
r=me with that change |
estebank
commented
Jan 9, 2017
@alexcrichton, done. I also removed two duplicated asserts while I was at it. |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 9, 2017
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Jan 9, 2017
📌 Commit d8b3a64 has been approved by |
As per @alexcrichton's comment in rust-lang#38607.
bors
commented
Jan 9, 2017
⌛ Testing commit d8b3a64 with merge db073ca... |
bors
commented
Jan 9, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 9, 2017
via email
@bors: retry
* network error …On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:06 AM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-travis
<https://travis-ci.org/rust-lang/rust/builds/190300898>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38607 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95FP30U7nj8Ib1CyQ69omd3tvLCvUks5rQmkWgaJpZM4LVd9Q>
.
|
…hton Test for appropriate span on second custom derive Adds test for and closesrust-lang#36935.
Adds test for and closes#36935.