Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ignore more gdb versions with buggy rust support - #39530
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 4, 2017
Contributor
r? @aturon (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
alexcrichton
commented
Feb 4, 2017
Member
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Feb 4, 2017
Collaborator
📌 Commit 112a5a0 has been approved by |
frewsxcv added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2017
ignore more gdb versions with buggy rust support This extends the versions of gdb which were ignored in rust-lang#39039. While just ignoring gdb versions up to 7.12.1 would have been sufficient for now, I believe (after consulting https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Versions) that ignoring versions up to 7.12.9 will prevent the tests failing again for 7.12.2, etc. while still running all tests for the development versions of gdb (which will be >= 7.12.10 as far as I can tell). This should fixrust-lang#39522. cc @Manishearth, @michaelwoerister, rust-lang#38948
frewsxcv added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2017
ignore more gdb versions with buggy rust support This extends the versions of gdb which were ignored in rust-lang#39039. While just ignoring gdb versions up to 7.12.1 would have been sufficient for now, I believe (after consulting https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Versions) that ignoring versions up to 7.12.9 will prevent the tests failing again for 7.12.2, etc. while still running all tests for the development versions of gdb (which will be >= 7.12.10 as far as I can tell). This should fixrust-lang#39522. cc @Manishearth, @michaelwoerister, rust-lang#38948
frewsxcv added a commit
to frewsxcv/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2017
ignore more gdb versions with buggy rust support This extends the versions of gdb which were ignored in rust-lang#39039. While just ignoring gdb versions up to 7.12.1 would have been sufficient for now, I believe (after consulting https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Versions) that ignoring versions up to 7.12.9 will prevent the tests failing again for 7.12.2, etc. while still running all tests for the development versions of gdb (which will be >= 7.12.10 as far as I can tell). This should fixrust-lang#39522. cc @Manishearth, @michaelwoerister, rust-lang#38948
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This extends the versions of gdb which were ignored in #39039. While just ignoring gdb versions up to 7.12.1 would have been sufficient for now, I believe (after consulting https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Versions) that ignoring versions up to 7.12.9 will prevent the tests failing again for 7.12.2, etc. while still running all tests for the development versions of gdb (which will be >= 7.12.10 as far as I can tell).
This should fix#39522.
cc @Manishearth, @michaelwoerister, #38948