Skip to content

rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml - #39587

Merged
bors merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Keruspe:master
Feb 10, 2017
Merged

rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml#39587
bors merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
Keruspe:master

Conversation

@Keruspe

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.

This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.

Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@aturon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors: r+

Thanks!

@bors

bors commented Feb 6, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 7c2752a has been approved by aturon

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Could you also update src/bootstrap/config.toml.example with the new option, where it goes, and a short comment to what it does?

Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
@Keruspe

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcrichton Done (I basically copy-pasted the comment from flags.rs for the description)

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors: r+

@bors

bors commented Feb 6, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 4268872 has been approved by alexcrichton

@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2017
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2017
rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml
Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.
This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.
@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2017
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2017
rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml
Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.
This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.
@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2017
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2017
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2017
rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml
Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.
This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.
@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2017
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2017
rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml
Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.
This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.
@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2017
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2017
Rollup of 6 pull requests
- Successful merges: #38165, #39456, #39587, #39589, #39598, #39641
- Failed merges: #39586, #39595
frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2017
rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml
Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.
This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.
@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2017
@bors

bors commented Feb 9, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39677) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

* 'master' of git://github.com/rust-lang/rust: (70 commits)
sanitizer-dylib: only run where std for x86_64-linux is available
travis: Fix build order of dist-x86-linux
fix the sanitizer-dylib test on non x86_64 linux hosts
dist-x86-linux: install newer kernel headers
enable sanitizers on build job that tests x86_64 linux
enable sanitizers on x86_64-linux releases
use helper function in the rebuild logic of the rustc_*san crates
build/test the sanitizers only when --enable-sanitizers is used
sanitizer support
Add missing urls on join_paths
Add test for rust-lang#27433
Add more examples, get everything passing at last.
Remove some leftover makefiles.
Add more test for rustdoc --test
Rename manifest_version to manifest-version
reference: clarify #[cfg] section
Bump stable release date
rustbuild: Clean build/dist on `make clean`
Add missing urls for current_dir
review nits
...
@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors: r+

@bors

bors commented Feb 9, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit ec73ef9 has been approved by alexcrichton

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2017
rustbuild: support setting verbosity in config.toml
Most if not all the configuration is settable trhough config.toml but the verbosity isn't yet.
This avoids having to pass -v to x.py on each command if you want verbosity to be always on.
@frewsxcvfrewsxcv mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2017
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2017
Rollup of 6 pull requests
- Successful merges: #39587, #39674, #39693, #39700, #39705, #39707
- Failed merges:
@bors
bors merged commit ec73ef9 into rust-lang:masterFeb 10, 2017
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@Keruspe@rust-highfive@aturon@bors@alexcrichton