Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
impl RangeArgument for RangeInclusive and add appropriate tests - #39936
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 18, 2017
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
alexcrichton
commented
Feb 28, 2017
Oops sorry I think I missed this, apologies! Nevertheless looks great, thank you! @bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
📌 Commit 4338290 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 4338290 with merge 44f0926... |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
alexcrichton
commented
Feb 28, 2017
via email
@bors: retry
* network failure …On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor
<https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2158>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#39936 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95Ci6c4E7j29wPhzY5ke6Us6YDj-5ks5rhFm7gaJpZM4MFOCg>
.
|
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 4338290 with merge 1808b08... |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
alexcrichton
commented
Feb 28, 2017
via email
@bors: retry
* s3 outage …On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:12 PM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor
<https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2160>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#39936 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95P9ZhWnz5UnNc5fjrxZ7OZnZevqZks5rhHG2gaJpZM4MFOCg>
.
|
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 4338290 with merge 91af879... |
bors
commented
Feb 28, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
alexcrichton
commented
Feb 28, 2017
via email
@bors: retry
* network error …On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:24 PM, bors ***@***.***> wrote:
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor
<https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2162>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#39936 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95H10IWu9S3E9p-ZZ-FpYCDVgoca7ks5rhHRTgaJpZM4MFOCg>
.
|
…excrichton impl RangeArgument for RangeInclusive and add appropriate tests Now that `RangeArgument` returns a `Bound`, the impl for `RangeInclusive` is natural to implement and all that's required are tests around it.
bors
commented
Mar 1, 2017
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40167) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Now that
RangeArgumentreturns aBound, the impl forRangeInclusiveis natural to implement and all that's required are tests around it.