Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Check privacy of trait items in all contexts - #41332
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 16, 2017
r? @arielb1 (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
petrochenkov
commented
Apr 16, 2017
r? @eddyb |
eddyb
commented
Apr 16, 2017
The changes LGTM, started a crater run to see if there's any real impact. |
eddyb
commented
Apr 17, 2017
Sadly, Crater now outputs |
eddyb
commented
Apr 20, 2017
Paging @brson again, to make sure he sees it when he gets back. |
nagisa
commented
Apr 24, 2017
@eddyb Did you try again since? |
brson
commented
Apr 24, 2017
brson
commented
Apr 25, 2017
eddyb
commented
Apr 25, 2017
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
📌 Commit 4f7ab0e has been approved by |
Check privacy of trait items in all contexts Fixesrust-lang#28514 This is a sufficiently rare scenario and it's currently guarded by `private_in_public` lint, so it shouldn't be a [breaking-change] in practice.
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 4f7ab0e with merge c53bc6d... |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
petrochenkov
commented
Apr 25, 2017
Conflict with recently merged #41494, will fix today. |
arielb1
commented
Apr 25, 2017
@bors r- |
petrochenkov
commented
Apr 25, 2017
@bors r=eddyb |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
📌 Commit 4bd417e has been approved by |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 4bd417e with merge a268165... |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
Probably spurious, though odd. Filed #41545 to track this. @bors retry |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2017
Check privacy of trait items in all contexts Fixes#28514 This is a sufficiently rare scenario and it's currently guarded by `private_in_public` lint, so it shouldn't be a [breaking-change] in practice.
bors
commented
Apr 26, 2017
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Type privacy polishing Various preparations before implementing rust-lang/rfcs#2145 containing final minor breaking changes (mostly for unstable code or code using `allow(private_in_public)`). (Continuation of #42125, #44633 and #41332.) It would be good to run crater on this. r? @eddyb
Fixes#28514
This is a sufficiently rare scenario and it's currently guarded by
private_in_publiclint, so it shouldn't be a [breaking-change] in practice.