Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Split old and experimental wasm builders - #43175
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Jul 12, 2017
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
alexcrichton
commented
Jul 12, 2017
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Jul 12, 2017
📌 Commit 373e958 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jul 13, 2017
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #43129) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
tlively
commented
Jul 13, 2017
@alexcrichton updated |
alexcrichton
commented
Jul 13, 2017
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Jul 13, 2017
📌 Commit 3bf8116 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Jul 14, 2017
Split old and experimental wasm builders #42784 introduced configuration errors in the wasm builder by mixing different versions of the tools. This PR separates the wasm32-unknown-emscripten and wasm32-experimental-emscripten builders to resolve these errors.
bors
commented
Jul 14, 2017
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
#42784 introduced configuration errors in the wasm builder by mixing different versions of the tools. This PR separates the wasm32-unknown-emscripten and wasm32-experimental-emscripten builders to resolve these errors.