Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update rls-data for save analysis - #45096
Conversation
0.10 -> 0.11 This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct)
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 7, 2017
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @arielb1 (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
carols10cents
commented
Oct 9, 2017
Thanks for the PR! We’ll periodically check in on it to make sure that @arielb1 or someone else from the team reviews it soon. |
arielb1
commented
Oct 11, 2017
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 11, 2017
Thanks for the PR! Can this also update the |
sunjay
commented
Oct 11, 2017
I have some instructions that should help you update the rustfmt submodule. Please let me know in the PR if you run into anything so I can update the instructions before they get merged. |
DSpeckhals
commented
Oct 11, 2017
@alexcrichton I pushed a commit that updates @sunjay Thanks for the tips! They saved me some frustration. |
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 11, 2017
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Oct 11, 2017
📌 Commit 218103e has been approved by |
sophiajt
commented
Oct 13, 2017
bors
commented
Oct 13, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 218103e with merge 33a10f59619a455f8479ac4db5da648ca9f8fd5c... |
bors
commented
Oct 14, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
kennytm
commented
Oct 14, 2017
RLS tests failed on Windows. Details |
DSpeckhals
commented
Oct 14, 2017
Hmmm...the test failures only happen when running the tests with x.py. Running with I know why |
bors
commented
Oct 14, 2017
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #45175) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 16, 2017
Can you reproduce with |
DSpeckhals
commented
Oct 16, 2017
Yes. But not while running |
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 16, 2017
Maybe other dependencies have a slightly different version? I've had great difficulty myself in debugging rls tests historically... I've found though that |
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 23, 2017
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Oct 23, 2017
📌 Commit 933b3fb has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 23, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 933b3fbf9bdeb978f96132c959bf2042b4513c73 with merge 9569d3e0e27f939e9d05c6e44caf06bcf161e085... |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
kennytm
commented
Oct 24, 2017
Details |
DSpeckhals
commented
Oct 24, 2017
The failure is an intermittent timing issue with new tests in the RLS. See rust-lang/rls#524 for context. Until the fix is made, would it be reasonable to mark the RLS as "Compiling" instead of "Testing" in |
bors
commented
Oct 24, 2017
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #44766) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
alexcrichton
commented
Oct 25, 2017
@bors: r+ |
bors
commented
Oct 25, 2017
📌 Commit aba409c has been approved by |
bors
commented
Oct 26, 2017
…r=alexcrichton Update rls-data for save analysis rls-data: 0.10 -> 0.11 This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct). The first commit updates rls-data, and makes the changes to dump_visitor. The second commit updates the rls submodule, and removes "members" that were deleted from that update in src/Cargo.toml. Note, that when building the project, rustfmt-nightly was updated in Cargo.lock. If these changes should be excluded, I can revert it. cc/ @nrc
bors
commented
Oct 26, 2017
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
rls-data: 0.10 -> 0.11
This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct).
The first commit updates rls-data, and makes the changes to dump_visitor. The second commit updates the rls submodule, and removes "members" that were deleted from that update in src/Cargo.toml.
Note, that when building the project, rustfmt-nightly was updated in Cargo.lock. If these changes should be excluded, I can revert it.
cc/ @nrc