Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Clarify docs for split_at_mut - #46930
Conversation
The `&mut` here didn't make immediate sense to me. Keep the docs for this function consistent with the non-mut version.
rust-highfive
commented
Dec 21, 2017
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Kimundi (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
QuietMisdreavus
commented
Dec 21, 2017
Ooh, i like this one better, thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Dec 21, 2017
📌 Commit 8a956e4 has been approved by |
…avus Clarify docs for split_at_mut The `&mut` here didn't make immediate sense to me. Keep the docs for this function consistent with the non-mut version.
…avus Clarify docs for split_at_mut The `&mut` here didn't make immediate sense to me. Keep the docs for this function consistent with the non-mut version.
bors
commented
Dec 25, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 8a956e4 with merge 1fb8e77d2b262776fc6a822328ac4808ad9a1b4c... |
bors
commented
Dec 25, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
bors
commented
Dec 26, 2017
⌛ Testing commit 8a956e4 with merge 4b5df5aacbb1ae70293dc77009de37f39a154cbd... |
bors
commented
Dec 26, 2017
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
…avus Clarify docs for split_at_mut The `&mut` here didn't make immediate sense to me. Keep the docs for this function consistent with the non-mut version.
The
&muthere didn't make immediate sense to me. Keep the docs for this function consistent with the non-mut version.