Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Small typeck refactorings - #49419
Merged
Merged
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Mar 27, 2018
Contributor
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
bors
commented
Mar 27, 2018
Collaborator
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #49202) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
leoyvensforce-pushed
the
small-typeck-refactorings
branch
from
March 27, 2018 18:30
587acb9 to
b6bde1bComparebors
commented
Mar 29, 2018
Collaborator
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #49313) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
leoyvensforce-pushed
the
small-typeck-refactorings
branch
from
April 2, 2018 18:06
b6bde1b to
6511ef3Comparenikomatsakis
commented
Apr 2, 2018
Contributor
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 2, 2018
Collaborator
📌 Commit 6511ef3 has been approved by |
kennytm added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2018
…gs, r=nikomatsakis Small typeck refactorings Some code improvements I noticed while reading the code.
bors
commented
Apr 3, 2018
Collaborator
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #49348) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
So we can cut some params by using stuff from the environment.
leoyvensforce-pushed
the
small-typeck-refactorings
branch
from
April 3, 2018 13:19
6511ef3 to
0a3eb5cComparenikomatsakis
commented
Apr 4, 2018
Contributor
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Apr 4, 2018
Collaborator
📌 Commit 0a3eb5c has been approved by |
alexcrichton added a commit
to alexcrichton/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2018
…gs, r=nikomatsakis Small typeck refactorings Some code improvements I noticed while reading the code.
bors
commented
Apr 7, 2018
Collaborator
bors added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2018
…atsakis Small typeck refactorings Some code improvements I noticed while reading the code.
bors
commented
Apr 7, 2018
Collaborator
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some code improvements I noticed while reading the code.