Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
HybridIdxSet tweaks - #53656
Conversation
nikomatsakis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice. r=me once travis is happy and post rebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
didn't I already review this? Am I just getting confused...
nikomatsakis
commented
Aug 24, 2018
@bors r=nnethercote |
bors
commented
Aug 24, 2018
📌 Commit f52c0b93e45def9e5c5010f3d90a9156afac4110 has been approved by |
nikomatsakis
commented
Aug 24, 2018
@bors r- |
nikomatsakis
commented
Aug 24, 2018
@bors delegate=nnethercote |
bors
commented
Aug 24, 2018
✌️ @nnethercote can now approve this pull request |
nnethercote
commented
Aug 24, 2018
Oh, I mismanaged this branch... the first three commits already landed in #53520. It's just the last two commits that are new. Sorry for the confusion. |
Because `domain` is a more obvious term than `universe` for this concept.
They let `union()`, `union_sparse()` and `union_hybrid()` be merged. Likewise for subtract()`, `subtract_sparse()` and `subtract_hybrid()`.
f52c0b9 to
626b298Comparennethercote
commented
Aug 24, 2018
@bors r=nikomatsakis |
bors
commented
Aug 24, 2018
📌 Commit 626b298 has been approved by |
bors
commented
Aug 27, 2018
`HybridIdxSet` tweaks A couple of tweaks to `HybridIdxSet`. r? @nikomatsakis
bors
commented
Aug 27, 2018
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
A couple of tweaks to
HybridIdxSet.r? @nikomatsakis