Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module - #56996
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Dec 19, 2018
r? @KodrAus (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
eb29deb to
80c67d3Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
80c67d3 to
2e48674Comparerust-highfive
commented
Dec 20, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
2e48674 to
28f8c72Comparerust-highfive
commented
Dec 26, 2018
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
KodrAus
commented
Jan 1, 2019
sad trombone @bors retry |
clarfonthey
commented
Jan 3, 2019
I honestly don't know how to fix the error here. I was under the impression that you could set the stability of an export differently from the original, but that might have changed. |
bors
commented
Jan 9, 2019
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #56407) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
28f8c72 to
48e732bComparerust-highfive
commented
Jan 9, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
KodrAus
commented
Jan 9, 2019
It's a bit unfortunate. How about we punt on the feature gate, decide in #55002 whether the name should be |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any reason not to deprecate this one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because if the other name is unstable, then you can't actually use the replacement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah of course :) I'd already put myself in the mindset that this would be stable.
clarfonthey
commented
Jan 9, 2019
Do you think that it would be worthwhile simply doing an FCP here to name the replacement I can update the PR to make the renamed version instantly stable and deprecate the old one, if that's desired. |
KodrAus
commented
Jan 9, 2019
Sure, let's do that 👍 @rfcbot doesn't actually like me though so I'll just give the libs team a ping. cc @rust-lang/libs what do you think about deprecating If we don't want the insta-stable |
clarfonthey
commented
Jan 9, 2019
That's a good idea-- I'll update the PR to do that regardless and we can decide whether to insta-stabilise or not. |
alexcrichton
commented
Jan 10, 2019
I think it's fine to deprecate the one in |
dfc1289 to
10696c6Comparekennytm
commented
Jan 15, 2019
@bors retry |
rust-highfive
commented
Jan 15, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
10696c6 to
24ca530CompareFixed broken link; should be ready to merge now. Also if someone could add the appropriate tags to the tracking issue I'd appreciate it. |
KodrAus
commented
Jan 16, 2019
@bors r+ Thanks @clarcharr! I'll update the tracking issue. |
bors
commented
Jan 16, 2019
📌 Commit 24ca530 has been approved by |
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in rust-lang#55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in rust-lang#55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in rust-lang#55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
bors
commented
Jan 18, 2019
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in #55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
bors
commented
Jan 18, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
As mentioned in #55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have
_hintin its name.