Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
use the correct supertrait substitution in object_ty_for_trait - #57355
Conversation
arielb1
commented
Jan 5, 2019
rust-highfive
commented
Jan 5, 2019
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 8, 2019
@bors r+ |
bors
commented
Jan 8, 2019
📌 Commit 85c4b4c has been approved by |
emilyalbini
commented
Jan 9, 2019
@bors p=1 (beta nominated) |
bors
commented
Jan 10, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 85c4b4c with merge b0b3e7eee6cb6b2c076e35793200229c678e85d5... |
bors
commented
Jan 10, 2019
💥 Test timed out |
emilyalbini
commented
Jan 10, 2019
@bors retry Wut. |
bors
commented
Jan 10, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 85c4b4c with merge 627e72124c18c97d4d0ce54788b05c66ee3d585a... |
bors
commented
Jan 10, 2019
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 10, 2019
Discussed in the @rust-lang/compiler meeting. This is acccepted for backport, however we would like to see it land on nightly first and ideally have a bit of "airtime". Since this is next in the queue, this seems likely to happen. @bors p=22 -- to help ensure it stays high in the queue =) |
Xanewok
commented
Jan 10, 2019
Just a heads up, I'm not sure bors accepts comments after p= (seems to still be p=1 according to https://buildbot2.rust-lang.org/homu/queue/rust) |
varkor
commented
Jan 10, 2019
@bors p=22 |
Mark-Simulacrum
commented
Jan 11, 2019
Cc @rust-lang/release @pietroalbini - could we prepare a beta PR with this included? |
bors
commented
Jan 11, 2019
⌛ Testing commit 85c4b4c with merge 7a232f19bff4a3fdb2daaeac2fa95d1a0dfdf2ab... |
bors
commented
Jan 11, 2019
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
rust-highfive
commented
Jan 11, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Centril
commented
Jan 11, 2019
Seems spurious... @bors retry |
bors
commented
Jan 11, 2019
use the correct supertrait substitution in `object_ty_for_trait` beta-nominating because regression. Fixes#57156.
bors
commented
Jan 11, 2019
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
rust-highfive
commented
Jan 11, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
kennytm
commented
Jan 11, 2019
@bors retry |
bors
commented
Jan 11, 2019
use the correct supertrait substitution in `object_ty_for_trait` beta-nominating because regression. Fixes#57156.
bors
commented
Jan 11, 2019
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
[beta] Rollup backports Cherry-picked: * #57355: use the correct supertrait substitution in `object_ty_for_trait` * #57471: Updated RELEASES.md for 1.32.0 Rolled up: * #57483: [beta] Uniform path backports * c658d73: resolve: Avoid "self-confirming" resolutions in import validation * #57160: resolve: Fix an ICE in import validation * #56759: Stabilize `uniform_paths` r? @ghost
beta-nominating because regression.
Fixes#57156.