Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type _ - #57729
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Jan 18, 2019
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
nikomatsakis
commented
Jan 25, 2019
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Jan 25, 2019
📌 Commit b3690c6 has been approved by |
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
Centril
commented
Jan 26, 2019
Failed in rollup, #57912 (comment). @bors r- |
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Feb 25, 2019
ping from triage @pnkfelix you need to resolve #57912 (comment) |
pnkfelix
commented
Mar 11, 2019
will investigate |
__rust-highfive
commented
Mar 11, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
b3690c6 to
0c04937Compare__pnkfelix
commented
Mar 13, 2019
@bors r=nikomatsakis rollup |
bors
commented
Mar 13, 2019
📌 Commit 0c04937d64b3277f8d709715723b56236eb8e376 has been approved by |
rust-highfive
commented
Mar 13, 2019
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
kennytm
commented
Mar 13, 2019
…);` and potentially instantiated at different types. (Updated to reflect changes in diagnostic output and compiletest infrastructure.)
0c04937 to
4e5692dComparepnkfelix
commented
Mar 14, 2019
@bors r=nikomatsakis rollup |
bors
commented
Mar 14, 2019
📌 Commit 4e5692d has been approved by |
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
…constraints-on-bindings-too, r=nikomatsakis extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_` test that wildcard type `_` is not duplicated by `type Foo<X> = (X, X);` and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings. (NLL's handling of this for the type ascription *expression form* is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by `#![feature(type_ascription)]`.) cc rust-lang#55748
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #56348 (Add todo!() macro) - #57729 (extra testing of how NLL handles wildcard type `_`) - #57847 (dbg!() without parameters) - #58778 (Implement ExactSizeIterator for ToLowercase and ToUppercase) - #58812 (Clarify distinction between floor() and trunc()) - #58939 (Fix a tiny error in documentation of std::pin.) - #59116 (Be more discerning on when to attempt suggesting a comma in a macro invocation) - #59252 (add self to mailmap) - #59275 (Replaced self-reflective explicit types with clearer `Self` or `Self::…` in stdlib docs) - #59280 (Stabilize refcell_map_split feature) - #59290 (Run branch cleanup after copy prop) Failed merges: r? @ghost
test that wildcard type
_is not duplicated bytype Foo<X> = (X, X);and potentially instantiated at different types when used in type ascriptions in let bindings.(NLL's handling of this for the type ascription expression form is currently broken, or at least differs from what AST-borrowck does. I'll file a separate bug about that. Its not something critical to address since that expression is guarded by
#![feature(type_ascription)].)cc #55748