Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Get rid of doctree::Function - #79331
Closed
jyn514 wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 23, 2020
bors
commented
Nov 24, 2020
Collaborator
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #79377) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Builds on #79312 and #79314 and should not be merged before. Follow-up to #79264, continues breaking up #78082.
@GuillaumeGomez let me know if these would be easier to review as one PR - they're fairly independent, I just don't want to keep rebasing over the conflicts because git isn't smart.
r? @GuillaumeGomez