Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Clarify docs regarding sleep of zero duration - #79849
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Dec 9, 2020
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @sfackler (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
98a27d9 to
c40b5caComparerust-log-analyzer
commented
Dec 23, 2020
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
jyn514
commented
Dec 23, 2020
|
9170082 to
d0774a5Comparejyn514
commented
Dec 23, 2020
@Digital-Chaos I'm not the right reviewer, I'm not on the libs team. |
m-ou-se
commented
Jan 9, 2021
We've discussed this PR in the library team meeting a few days ago, and felt like an overview of what happens on the different platforms just like for |
Digital-Chaos
commented
Jan 11, 2021
Thanks for the feedback! As we are going for the extra docs route, will the change in his PR suffice or do we need more detail? |
Ah sorry; to clarify: We don't want to promise anything here, so something like
should not be there. That information would be fine if it was clear this is not a promise, but just a description of the current implementation. So, something like "Currently, .." or "The current implementation ...". See the documentation of Also, just like I'd say linking |
rust-log-analyzer
commented
Jan 15, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Updated to specify the underlying syscalls
a57d79e to
8a85a85Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix link reference Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Dylan-DPC-zz
commented
Feb 8, 2021
@Digital-Chaos any updates on changing this to match the meeting decision |
@Dylan-DPC, I updated the PR on 15th Jan with more info taking into account the feedback from @m-ou-se, and which was subsequently fixed by @jyn514 (also the 15th Jan), not quite sure why the status this PR is tagged as S-waiting-on-author? |
jyn514
commented
Feb 9, 2021
Ah ok, I didn't realize this was waiting on review. In the future you can use @rustbot modify labels: -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review |
m-ou-se
commented
Feb 9, 2021
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Feb 9, 2021
📌 Commit bb2a27b has been approved by |
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#79849 (Clarify docs regarding sleep of zero duration) - rust-lang#80438 (Add `Box::into_inner`.) - rust-lang#81466 (Add suggest mut method for loop) - rust-lang#81687 (Make Vec::split_at_spare_mut public) - rust-lang#81904 (Bump stabilization version for const int methods) - rust-lang#81909 ([compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs] Remove unnecessary refs in pattern matching) - rust-lang#81910 (Use format string in bootstrap panic instead of a string directly) - rust-lang#81913 (Rename HIR UnOp variants) - rust-lang#81925 (Add long explanation for E0547) - rust-lang#81926 (add suggestion to use the `async_recursion` crate) - rust-lang#81951 (Update cargo) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Clarify that the behaviour of sleep() when given a duration of zero is actually platform specific.