Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove PartialOrd, Ord from LocalDefId - #90408
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Oct 29, 2021
r? @jackh726 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
pierwill
commented
Oct 29, 2021
r? @cjgillot |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
cjgillot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR @pierwill! I left a few comments.
Those trait bounds on LocalDefId are used a lot, it may be easier to handle Idx and PartialOrd/Ord separately.
Changing data structures means we will have to be careful about perf implications.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
LocalDefIdLocalDefIdpierwill
commented
Oct 30, 2021
Thanks for reviewing, @cjgillot! I'll work on just the ordering traits for now. I also might see if |
624198a to
ae5bf6aCompareLocalDefIdPartialOrd, Ord from LocalDefId
Looks like rust/compiler/rustc_index/src/vec.rs Line 15 in 2b643e9 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Remove `rustc_hir::hir_id::HirIdVec` See rust-lang#90408 (comment): > IIRC, `HirIdVec` is never used, you can delete it. PR rust-lang#72015 has been abandoned. r? `@cjgillot`
Remove `rustc_hir::hir_id::HirIdVec` See rust-lang#90408 (comment): > IIRC, `HirIdVec` is never used, you can delete it. PR rust-lang#72015 has been abandoned. r? `@cjgillot`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
39238b3 to
8b48d70ComparePartialOrd, Ord from LocalDefIdPartialOrd, Ord from LocalDefId
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
pierwill
commented
Dec 13, 2021
439c33d to
46a508bCompareThis has been causing failures in CI here and in rust-lang#90408. A comment there (rust-lang#90408 (comment)) suggested blessing the output; this commit does that manually.
pierwill
commented
Dec 15, 2021
Once #89836 is merged (🤞🤞), this should be ready to go. :) |
46a508b to
f00fd59Comparematthiaskrgr
commented
Dec 16, 2021
Just for the record, the failure here #90408 (comment) is probably unrelated to this PR since it happened in other ci-runs as well :( : #91995 (comment) Made a tracking ticket: #92000 |
pierwill
commented
Dec 16, 2021
via email
This is ready for another bors attempt! @cjgillot …On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:26 AM Matthias Krüger ***@***.***> wrote:
Just for the record, the failure here #90408 (comment)
<#90408 (comment)> is
probably unrelated to this PR since it happened in other ci-runs as well :(
: #91995 (comment)
<#91995 (comment)>
Made a tracking ticket: #92000
<#92000>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#90408 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEV3NIFIUBXWJUREWIOIXNDURHLGXANCNFSM5HAF6KFQ>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
f00fd59 to
e6ff0baComparebjorn3
commented
Dec 22, 2021
@bors r=cjgillot |
bors
commented
Dec 22, 2021
📌 Commit e6ff0ba has been approved by |
bors
commented
Dec 22, 2021
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
commented
Dec 22, 2021
bors
commented
Dec 23, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
rust-timer
commented
Dec 23, 2021
Finished benchmarking commit (e983092): comparison url. Summary: This change led to large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
pierwill
commented
Dec 23, 2021
See previous comment here: #90408 (comment). @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged |
Part of work on #90317.