Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Suggest calling method on nested field when struct is missing method - #96372
Merged
Conversation
rust-highfive
commented
Apr 24, 2022
Contributor
r? @oli-obk (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
oli-obk
commented
Apr 25, 2022
Contributor
Neat! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Apr 25, 2022
Collaborator
📌 Commit dff7f25 has been approved by |
compiler-errors added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2022
…t, r=oli-obk Suggest calling method on nested field when struct is missing method Similar to the suggestion to change `x.field` to `x.nested.field`, implement a similar suggestion for when `x.method()` should be replaced with `x.nested.method()`.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2022
…t, r=oli-obk Suggest calling method on nested field when struct is missing method Similar to the suggestion to change `x.field` to `x.nested.field`, implement a similar suggestion for when `x.method()` should be replaced with `x.nested.method()`.
This was referenced Apr 26, 2022
bors added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2022
…laumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#94022 (Clarify that `Cow::into_owned` returns owned data) - rust-lang#94703 (Fix codegen bug in "ptx-kernel" abi related to arg passing) - rust-lang#95949 (Implement Default for AssertUnwindSafe) - rust-lang#96361 (Switch JS code to ES6) - rust-lang#96372 (Suggest calling method on nested field when struct is missing method) - rust-lang#96386 (simplify `describe_field` func in borrowck's diagnostics part) - rust-lang#96400 (Correct documentation for `Rvalue::ShallowInitBox`) - rust-lang#96415 (Remove references to git.io) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to the suggestion to change
x.fieldtox.nested.field, implement a similar suggestion for whenx.method()should be replaced withx.nested.method().