Skip to content

[breaking change]: mask argument type of _mm_shuffle_ps - #586

Merged
gnzlbg merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
gnzlbg:shuffle_arg
Apr 20, 2019
Merged

[breaking change]: mask argument type of _mm_shuffle_ps#586
gnzlbg merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
gnzlbg:shuffle_arg

Conversation

@gnzlbg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

DO NOT MERGE

If CI passes, I'll push this as a branch, and send a PR to rust-lang/rust to schedule a crater run. Depending on how much code this change breaks, we can re-evaluate what to do with issue #522 .

@gnzlbg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@alexcrichton so CI passed, shall I send a PR to rust-lang/rust to schedule a crater run ?

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@gnzlbg sure!

@gnzlbg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I think we should just merge this and deal with the fallout. cc @rust-lang-nursery/libs @Amanieu

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I believe the crater fun from 6ish months ago was clean right? I forget now the original reason for closing, but I'm personally still in favor for this

@Amanieu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think this is fine, we are just correcting an "incorrect" function signature and there are no crater failures.

@gnzlbg
gnzlbg merged commit 02d4be2 into rust-lang:masterApr 20, 2019
@gnzlbg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll send a PR to update stdsimd upstream, and will do a new crater run before the update. There is another breaking change in the pipeline, so I'll try to merge both. If the crater run fails we can always revert this.

gnzlbg added a commit to gnzlbg/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2019
This commit updates stdsimd and contains two breaking changes:
* rust-lang/stdarch#733
* rust-lang/stdarch#586
We already did a crater run of 586 but we should do another one here.
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2019
Breaking update of stdsimd
This commit updates stdsimd and contains two breaking changes:
* rust-lang/stdarch#733
* rust-lang/stdarch#586
We already did a crater run of 586 but we should do another one here.
r? @alexcrichton
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@gnzlbg@alexcrichton@Amanieu