Skip to content

Destroy VM with volumes UI rework - #28

Closed
dhlaluku wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
rework-destrovm-with-volumes
Closed

Destroy VM with volumes UI rework#28
dhlaluku wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
rework-destrovm-with-volumes

Conversation

@dhlaluku

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR removes the redundant checkbox to tick if user wants to delete volumes when destroying VMs

Description

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

image

How Has This Been Tested?

@dhlaluku
dhlaluku changed the base branch from master to 4.1l10nDecember 18, 2018 22:19
@dhlaluku
dhlaluku changed the base branch from 4.1l10n to masterDecember 18, 2018 22:19
@dhlaluku
dhlaluku changed the base branch from master to 4.11.2.0-RC20181030T1040December 18, 2018 22:20
@dhlaluku
dhlaluku changed the base branch from 4.11.2.0-RC20181030T1040 to masterDecember 18, 2018 22:21
@dhlaluku
dhlalukuforce-pushed the rework-destrovm-with-volumes branch from 1042b98 to edbb369CompareDecember 19, 2018 14:52
@andrijapanicsb

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Looks OK, after last commit - all volumes deleted with VM (volumes, then eventually VM) and GUI seems OK - even with silly long volume names, as shown below.

image

@dhlaluku
dhlalukuforce-pushed the rework-destrovm-with-volumes branch from edbb369 to cb73d57CompareJanuary 6, 2019 14:16
@dhlaluku
dhlaluku changed the base branch from master to 4.11January 7, 2019 07:53
@dhlaluku
dhlaluku changed the base branch from 4.11 to masterJanuary 7, 2019 07:54
@dhlalukudhlaluku closed this Jan 7, 2019
shwstppr added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2021
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
ui: fix UI label bug #28 (#34)
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
fix system vm migration with zone wide storage (#35)
* fix system vm migration with zone wide storage
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
* fix
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
* fix spacing
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
* add empty volumes check
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
fix fr568 issue #28 (#36)
Fixes systemvm migration with zone-wide storage
Check only for usable volumes
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
vmware: fix error msg for vmotion without shared storage (#37)
Fixes error message which wrongly mentions worker VM
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
refactor error message for interpod systemvm migration (#38)
Fixes error message introduced in #28
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
shwstppr added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2021
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
ui: fix UI label bug #28 (#34)
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
fix system vm migration with zone wide storage (#35)
* fix system vm migration with zone wide storage
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
* fix
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
* fix spacing
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
* add empty volumes check
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
fix fr568 issue #28 (#36)
Fixes systemvm migration with zone-wide storage
Check only for usable volumes
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
vmware: fix error msg for vmotion without shared storage (#37)
Fixes error message which wrongly mentions worker VM
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
refactor error message for interpod systemvm migration (#38)
Fixes error message introduced in #28
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@dhlaluku@andrijapanicsb@anuragaw