Fix #664 fixing coverage

[NimaSarajpoor]

This PR fixes the coverage issue raised in the PR #665, related to issue #664.

[NimaSarajpoor]

@seanlaw
When you notice all tests are passing, you may want to take a look and see if the inline comments are okay or not. I did as follows:

else # pragma: no cover # AB-join 

I think it fixes the coverage; however, I am not sure if you prefer to remove the second comment # AB-join or not.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #666 (859a3a1) into main (bcc5b02) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #666 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.87% 99.89% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 80 80 Lines 11455 11453 -2 ==========================================
Hits 11441 11441 + Misses 14 12 -2 

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
stumpy/scraamp.py	100.00% <ø> (+0.70%)	⬆️
stumpy/scrump.py	100.00% <ø> (+0.68%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[seanlaw]

When you notice all tests are passing, you may want to take a look and see if the inline comments are okay or not

Yeah, I noticed it originally and it didn't bother me a ton and I would've done the same thing as you. 😄

[seanlaw]

Thanks @NimaSarajpoor