SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement - #264

Merged
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

SpendingAmountScreen state handling improvement#264
jvsena42 merged 21 commits into
masterfrom
refactor/state-handling-improvement

Conversation

@jvsena42

@jvsena42jvsena42 commented Jul 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Related to #229

Description

  • Error message improvements
  • Max amount specific error message
  • Improvement on max amount and quarter button logic
  • Improvement on loading logic
  • Layout logic cleanup

Preview

transfer_tested.mp4

QA Notes

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Advanced
  • Error value higher than max amount
  • Error liquidity

@jvsena42jvsena42 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2025
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/viewmodels/TransferViewModel.kt Fixed
@jvsena42jvsena42 mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2025
3 tasks
Comment threadapp/src/main/java/to/bitkit/ui/screens/transfer/SpendingAmountScreen.kt Dismissed
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I'll do the TransferViewModel clean up and Unit tests in other branch to don't obfuscate the fixes from this one

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 29, 2025 16:40
@jvsena42
jvsena42 marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 16:55
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title Refactor/state handling improvementState handling improvementJul 29, 2025
@jvsena42jvsena42 changed the title State handling improvementSpendingAmountScreen state handling improvementJul 29, 2025

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice work!

Found only an issue which needs to be addressed IMHO, related to the max amount fee calculation

Comment on lines +236 to +240
val totalFeeFromAvailableAmount = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats = onChainBalance)
.getOrDefault(DEFAULT_TX_FEE.toULong())

// Get the max available balance discounting onChain fee
val availableAmount = onChainBalance - totalFeeFromAvailableAmount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We always get NodeException.InsufficientFunds exception when trying to calculateTotalFee for the entire onChainBalance.

That's the reason I added walletRepo.getMaxSendAmount(), which is not perfect either (I got sometimes failure for the onChainBalance - 1000sat buffer solution), but still much less error-prone:

suspendfungetMaxSendAmount(): ULong= withContext(bgDispatcher) {
val totalOnchainSats = balanceState.value.totalOnchainSats
if (totalOnchainSats ==0uL) {
return@withContext 0uL
}
try {
val minFeeBuffer =1000uL
val amountSats = (totalOnchainSats - minFeeBuffer).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
val fee = lightningRepo.calculateTotalFee(amountSats).getOrThrow()
val maxSendable = (totalOnchainSats - fee).coerceAtLeast(0uL)
return@withContext maxSendable
} catch (_:Throwable) {
Logger.debug("Could not calculate max send amount, using as fallback 90% of total", context =TAG)
val fallbackMax = (totalOnchainSats.toDouble() *0.9).toULong()
return@withContext fallbackMax
}
}

Much recommended to use the getMaxSendAmount() here as well, that way we won't ALWAYS end up with the DEFAULT_TX_FEE.

PS. I informed @coreyphillips about this issue but it's not the highest priority thus looking into it will be delayed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better, though I still get error: Invalid request format when selecting the max amount

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, because Invalid request format comes from bitkit-core's http call to Blocktank staging.

@jvsena42
jvsena42 requested a review from ovitrifJuly 30, 2025 11:25
@jvsena42
jvsena42 enabled auto-merge July 30, 2025 11:28
@jvsena42

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

This PR fixes the bug introduced here

@ovitrifovitrif left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice refactor, the changed code works good!

Added an remark for improvement, feel free to address outside of this PR though.

Tested

  • Normal Success flow
  • Max amount
  • 25%
  • Error value higher than max amount

Comment on lines +138 to +147
if (sats > _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend) {
setTransferEffect(
TransferEffect.ToastError(
title = context.getString(R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__title),
description = context.getString(
R.string.lightning__spending_amount__error_max__description
).replace("{amount}", _spendingUiState.value.maxAllowedToSend.toString()),
)
)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the RN app, the amount will not update if it would exceed the max limit.

I think we can easily do the same here with this code right after the effect:

_spendingUiState.update { it.copy(overrideSats = it.satsAmount) }
return

@jvsena42
jvsena42 merged commit c47a1f9 into masterJul 30, 2025
3 checks passed
@jvsena42
jvsena42 deleted the refactor/state-handling-improvement branch July 30, 2025 13:13
@ovitrifovitrif mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jvsena42@ovitrif@github-advanced-security