docs(issues): archive completed #2233 spec

[josecelano]

Archives the completed #2233 issue specification after PR #2237 merged and GitHub closed the issue automatically.

Related to #2233.

Summary

• Moves the Tune the unified PR review process from first-use evidence #2233 issue folder from docs/issues/open/ to docs/issues/closed/.
• Updates Tune the unified PR review process from first-use evidence #2233 metadata, progress log, and live self-references to the closed path.
• Adds Tune the unified PR review process from first-use evidence #2233 as a completed approved early implementation candidate in EPIC Overhaul: Automation Tools and AI Agent Guardrails #2003.
• Updates live references from the semantic-link conventions draft EPIC and PR docs(pr-reviews): [#2233] tune review process guidance #2237 audit.

Validation

• linter markdown
• linter cspell
• linter lychee
• git diff --check
• bash contrib/dev-tools/checks/tests/test-agent-review-report-contract.sh
• TORRUST_GIT_HOOKS_LOG_DIR=.tmp ./contrib/dev-tools/git/hooks/pre-commit.sh --format=text

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.39%. Comparing base (6e1e9d2) to head (6d9df35).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2242   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    85.39%   85.39%           
========================================
  Files          353      353           
  Lines        31315    31315           
  Branches     31315    31315           
========================================
+ Hits         26742    26743    +1     
  Misses        4190     4190           
+ Partials       383      382    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Warning

Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because it didn't start before the timeout. Make sure your repository has a runner available, or add a copilot-code-review.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.

Pull request overview

Archives the completed issue spec for #2233 by updating documentation links and metadata to reflect the move from open/ to closed/, and records completion in the #2003 EPIC and related docs.

Changes:

• Updates self-references and related-artifact links from docs/issues/open/... to docs/issues/closed/... for #2233 docs.
• Marks #2233 as done and appends completion evidence in the issue progress log.
• Adds #2233 as a completed early-implementation candidate in EPIC #2003 and updates semantic-link EPIC references.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
docs/pr-reviews/pr-2237-review.md	Updates related-artifact link to the archived (#2233) issue spec path.
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/manual-verification-evidence.md	Updates issue-spec reference to the closed location.
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/implementation-retrospective.md	Updates related-artifacts and evidence links to the closed location.
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/code-span-path-case-analysis.md	Updates the inventory TSV reference to the closed location.
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/agent-review-reports.md	Updates related-artifact link to the closed issue spec path.
docs/issues/open/2233-2003-tune-unified-pr-review-process/ISSUE.md	Marks issue as done, updates spec-path and related-artifacts, and records merge/closure evidence.
docs/issues/open/2003-overhaul-guardrails-and-automation/EPIC.md	Adds #2233 to related-artifacts and completed early-implementation candidates table.
docs/issues/drafts/refactor-semantic-link-conventions/EPIC.md	Updates related-artifacts to reference the closed (#2233) paths.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.