Skip to content

sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

Description

@desenmeng

Bug Report

Description

When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.

Reproduction

  1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
  2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
  3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
  4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
  5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

Minimal Example

exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

Root Cause Analysis

sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

Suggested Fix

Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

// Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

Environment

  • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
  • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
  • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
  • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

Workaround

Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
    Skip to content

    sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

    Description

    @desenmeng

    Bug Report

    Description

    When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

    Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
    This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
    

    Reproduction

    1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
    2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
    3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
    4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
    5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

    Minimal Example

    exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

    When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

    Root Cause Analysis

    sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

    This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

    Suggested Fix

    Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

    // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

    This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

    Environment

    • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
    • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
    • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
    • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

    Workaround

    Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
      Skip to content

      sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

      Description

      @desenmeng

      Bug Report

      Description

      When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

      Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
      This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
      

      Reproduction

      1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
      2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
      3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
      4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
      5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

      Minimal Example

      exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

      When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

      Root Cause Analysis

      sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

      This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

      Suggested Fix

      Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

      // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

      This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

      Environment

      • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
      • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
      • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
      • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

      Workaround

      Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Labels

      No labels
      No labels

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
        Skip to content

        sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

        Description

        @desenmeng

        Bug Report

        Description

        When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

        Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
        This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
        

        Reproduction

        1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
        2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
        3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
        4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
        5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

        Minimal Example

        exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

        When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

        Root Cause Analysis

        sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

        This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

        Suggested Fix

        Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

        // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

        This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

        Environment

        • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
        • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
        • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
        • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

        Workaround

        Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
          Skip to content

          sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

          Description

          @desenmeng

          Bug Report

          Description

          When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

          Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
          This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
          

          Reproduction

          1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
          2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
          3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
          4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
          5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

          Minimal Example

          exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

          When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

          Root Cause Analysis

          sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

          This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

          Suggested Fix

          Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

          // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

          This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

          Environment

          • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
          • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
          • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
          • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

          Workaround

          Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Labels

          No labels
          No labels

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
            Skip to content

            sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

            Description

            @desenmeng

            Bug Report

            Description

            When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

            Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
            This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
            

            Reproduction

            1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
            2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
            3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
            4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
            5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

            Minimal Example

            exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

            When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

            Root Cause Analysis

            sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

            This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

            Suggested Fix

            Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

            // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

            This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

            Environment

            • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
            • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
            • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
            • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

            Workaround

            Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
              Skip to content

              sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

              Description

              @desenmeng

              Bug Report

              Description

              When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

              Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
              This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
              

              Reproduction

              1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
              2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
              3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
              4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
              5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

              Minimal Example

              exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

              When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

              Root Cause Analysis

              sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

              This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

              Suggested Fix

              Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

              // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

              This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

              Environment

              • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
              • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
              • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
              • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

              Workaround

              Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Labels

              No labels
              No labels

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all · Issue #1266 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
                Skip to content

                sleep() causes 'Unconsumed event in event log' when called concurrently via Promise.all #1266

                Description

                @desenmeng

                Bug Report

                Description

                When multiple tool calls execute in parallel via Promise.all (as DurableAgent does internally), concurrent sleep() calls cause event log corruption during replay, resulting in:

                Unconsumed event in event log: eventType=wait_completed, correlationId=wait_xxx, eventId=evnt_xxx.
                This indicates a corrupted or invalid event log.
                

                Reproduction

                1. Create a DurableAgent with tools that use sleep() for polling (e.g., polling an external API queue)
                2. Ask the AI to call 5+ tools simultaneously
                3. DurableAgent executes tools via Promise.all (line 189 of durable-agent.js)
                4. Each tool calls sleep() concurrently
                5. On replay, the event log has unconsumed wait_completed events

                Minimal Example

                exportasyncfunctionmyWorkflow(){"use workflow";constagent=newDurableAgent({model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6",tools: {generateImage: tool({description: "Generate an image",inputSchema: z.object({prompt: z.string()}),execute: async(params)=>{// Submit to external queueconstrequestId=awaitsubmitStep(params.prompt);// Poll with sleep — breaks when multiple tools run concurrentlyfor(leti=0;i<100;i++){awaitsleep("5s");conststatus=awaitcheckStatusStep(requestId,i);if(status==="COMPLETED")break;}returnawaitgetResultStep(requestId);},}),},});awaitagent.stream({ messages,writable: getWritable()});}

                When the LLM returns 5 generateImage tool calls, DurableAgent runs them all via Promise.all, creating 5 concurrent sleep() calls. On replay, the execution order of these concurrent sleeps may differ, causing event correlation mismatches.

                Root Cause Analysis

                sleep() uses order-based correlation IDs internally. With Promise.all, the order in which concurrent sleep() calls execute is non-deterministic. During replay, the runtime may match a wait_completed event to the wrong sleep() call because the execution order differs from the original run.

                This contrasts with "use step" functions, which are identified by file + function + args (content-based), making them safe for concurrent use.

                Suggested Fix

                Add an optional token or name parameter to sleep() for content-based correlation:

                // Current — order-based, breaks with Promise.allawaitsleep("5s");// Proposed — content-based, safe for concurrent useawaitsleep("5s",{token: `poll-${requestId}-${iteration}`});

                This would align with how createWebhook({ token }) and createHook({ token }) already support deterministic correlation via explicit tokens.

                Environment

                • workflow@4.1.0-beta.63
                • @workflow/ai@4.0.1-beta.54
                • @workflow/core@4.1.0-beta.63
                • Platform: Vercel (Next.js)

                Workaround

                Currently working around this by avoiding sleep() in tools that may execute concurrently — using fal.subscribe() (blocking poll) for fast operations and planning to use createWebhook() for long-running ones.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions