Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author by TooTallNate · Pull Request #2091 · vercel/workflow · GitHub
Skip to content

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author - #2091

Merged
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution
May 22, 2026
Merged

[ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author#2091
TooTallNate merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/changelog-backport-attribution

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

@changesets/changelog-github resolves a changeset commit to its associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL associatedPullRequests field. For commits that landed on stable via the backport workflow, that resolves to the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot] (since .github/workflows/backport.yml uses GraphQL createCommitOnBranch to produce signed commits), so the generated changelog ends up with Thanks @github-actions! instead of the original contributor. See e.g. the Thanks @github-actions! lines in the diff for #1921.

This adds a small wrapper at .changeset/changelog.mjs around @changesets/changelog-github that:

  1. Queries GitHub GraphQL for the PRs associated with each changeset commit, picking the oldest-merged one (matching @changesets/get-github-info's own selection logic).
  2. Detects backport PRs by matching the title (e.g. Backport #N: ...) or body (e.g. Automated backport of #N to `stable` ...) — both formats produced by .github/workflows/backport.yml.
  3. When a backport is detected, resolves the original PR number and injects pr: #<original> and commit: <backportSha> directives into the changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. Both directives are documented @changesets/changelog-github features.

The result: the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the original PR and author (e.g. Thanks @pranaygp! with a link to PR #2046) while the commit link still points at the backport commit on the release branch.

Non-backport commits, commits without an associated PR, and any lookup failures all fall through to plain upstream delegation — a flaky network call can never break pnpm changeset version.

Loaded via Node's require(esm) (the release workflow uses Node 24 which supports it).

Verification

Verified end-to-end on a stable worktree by running pnpm changeset version and inspecting the rendered changelog. The new 4.2.5 section in packages/core/CHANGELOG.md rendered as:

All five entries that previously rendered as Thanks @github-actions! (see the diff in #1921) now correctly attribute to the original PR and author. Non-backport entries are unchanged.

No changeset entry is required — this is a release-tooling-only change with no impact on published packages.

`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2026 17:51
CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings May 22, 2026 17:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4684033

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express0.029s (-33.6% 🟢)1.005s (~)0.976s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro0.030s (-29.7% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.976s101.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.041s (-29.3% 🟢)1.010s (~)0.969s101.39x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.048s1.006s0.958s101.65x
🐘 PostgresNitro0.052s (-45.5% 🟢)1.012s (-3.0%)0.960s101.77x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.056s1.011s0.955s101.91x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro0.256s (-37.4% 🟢)2.188s (-12.8% 🟢)1.932s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro1.071s (-5.3% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.936s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.074s (-4.6%)2.006s (~)0.932s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.086s (-4.8%)2.009s (~)0.923s101.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.108s2.007s0.899s101.03x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.122s2.009s0.887s101.05x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.143s (~)2.020s (~)0.877s101.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro1.674s (-57.0% 🟢)3.666s (-38.0% 🟢)1.992s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Nitro10.421s (-4.8%)11.023s (~)0.603s31.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro10.425s (-4.1%)11.017s (~)0.593s31.00x
💻 LocalExpress10.428s (-4.5%)11.022s (~)0.593s31.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress10.610s (-3.2%)11.024s (~)0.414s31.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.655s11.022s0.367s31.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)10.731s11.021s0.290s31.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro13.710s (-42.2% 🟢)15.899s (-36.7% 🟢)2.190s21.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
💻 Local🥇 Express13.434s (-10.3% 🟢)14.028s (-6.7% 🟢)0.593s51.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro13.452s (-7.8% 🟢)14.016s (-6.7% 🟢)0.564s51.00x
💻 LocalNitro13.461s (-10.6% 🟢)14.027s (-12.5% 🟢)0.566s51.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress13.720s (-5.9% 🟢)14.040s (-6.5% 🟢)0.320s51.02x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)14.088s15.029s0.941s41.05x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)14.278s15.019s0.740s41.06x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro21.465s (-66.7% 🟢)23.268s (-65.1% 🟢)1.803s31.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express11.846s (-15.4% 🟢)12.263s (-16.0% 🟢)0.417s81.00x
💻 LocalExpress11.871s (-28.5% 🟢)12.022s (-29.4% 🟢)0.151s81.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro11.876s (-15.0% 🟢)12.017s (-16.0% 🟢)0.141s81.00x
💻 LocalNitro11.918s (-29.0% 🟢)12.272s (-27.9% 🟢)0.354s81.01x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)12.952s13.023s0.070s71.09x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)13.277s14.015s0.738s71.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro27.974s (-93.4% 🟢)30.249s (-92.9% 🟢)2.275s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.146s (-10.1% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.861s151.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.173s (-28.1% 🟢)2.005s (-3.3%)0.832s151.02x
💻 LocalExpress1.176s (-21.0% 🟢)2.006s (~)0.830s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.192s (-5.4% 🟢)2.013s (~)0.821s151.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.204s2.007s0.803s151.05x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.278s2.006s0.728s151.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.564s (+26.5% 🔺)5.454s (+26.2% 🔺)1.889s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.198s (-49.0% 🟢)2.007s (-33.3% 🟢)0.808s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.285s (-45.6% 🟢)2.077s (-31.0% 🟢)0.792s151.07x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.338s2.007s0.669s151.12x
💻 LocalExpress1.705s (-42.3% 🟢)2.005s (-41.9% 🟢)0.301s151.42x
💻 LocalNitro1.732s (-44.9% 🟢)2.005s (-48.4% 🟢)0.273s151.45x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.780s2.006s0.226s151.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.590s (-11.4% 🟢)5.392s (-8.9% 🟢)1.802s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.316s (-62.2% 🟢)2.006s (-50.0% 🟢)0.691s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.583s (-54.6% 🟢)2.085s (-48.0% 🟢)0.502s151.20x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.593s2.007s0.413s151.21x
💻 LocalNitro4.914s (-41.1% 🟢)5.345s (-40.7% 🟢)0.431s63.74x
💻 LocalExpress5.109s (-38.7% 🟢)5.345s (-40.8% 🟢)0.237s63.88x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.657s6.213s0.556s54.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.580s (+86.6% 🔺)8.657s (+56.4% 🔺)2.077s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.157s (-8.0% 🟢)2.007s (~)0.850s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.193s2.006s0.813s151.03x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.194s (-5.0% 🟢)2.011s (~)0.817s151.03x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.294s2.006s0.712s151.12x
💻 LocalNitro1.316s (-29.5% 🟢)2.007s (-14.3% 🟢)0.691s151.14x
💻 LocalExpress1.353s (-28.6% 🟢)2.006s (-15.1% 🟢)0.653s151.17x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.723s (+10.7% 🔺)4.533s (+8.7% 🔺)1.810s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.184s (-49.4% 🟢)2.012s (-33.2% 🟢)0.827s151.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.209s (-48.3% 🟢)2.008s (-33.3% 🟢)0.799s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.336s2.008s0.672s151.13x
💻 LocalNitro1.985s (-35.2% 🟢)2.391s (-38.5% 🟢)0.406s131.68x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.029s2.507s0.478s121.71x
💻 LocalExpress2.039s (-34.9% 🟢)2.508s (-33.3% 🟢)0.470s121.72x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro3.751s (+16.0% 🔺)5.476s (+7.9% 🔺)1.725s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.320s (-62.1% 🟢)2.007s (-49.9% 🟢)0.688s151.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.347s (-61.5% 🟢)2.018s (-49.7% 🟢)0.672s151.02x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.583s2.008s0.424s151.20x
💻 LocalExpress5.533s (-37.1% 🟢)6.013s (-35.2% 🟢)0.480s54.19x
💻 LocalNitro5.743s (-37.2% 🟢)6.213s (-38.0% 🟢)0.470s54.35x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)5.769s6.215s0.446s54.37x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.537s (+8.7% 🔺)7.799s (+14.4% 🔺)2.262s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.460s (-43.9% 🟢)1.023s (+1.7%)0.563s591.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.465s (-44.6% 🟢)1.028s (~)0.563s591.01x
💻 LocalNitro0.468s (-52.2% 🟢)1.004s (-8.2% 🟢)0.536s601.02x
💻 LocalExpress0.520s (-47.2% 🟢)1.039s (-3.5%)0.519s581.13x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.673s1.006s0.333s601.46x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.709s1.005s0.296s601.54x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.534s (-74.9% 🟢)7.687s (-68.0% 🟢)2.153s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.998s (-48.2% 🟢)1.330s (-36.7% 🟢)0.332s681.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.197s (-60.3% 🟢)2.006s (-44.1% 🟢)0.809s451.20x
💻 LocalNitro1.199s (-60.5% 🟢)2.006s (-46.6% 🟢)0.807s451.20x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.284s (-35.1% 🟢)1.731s (-23.3% 🟢)0.447s521.29x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.591s2.007s0.416s451.59x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.752s2.006s0.254s451.76x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro14.568s (-63.1% 🟢)16.623s (-59.7% 🟢)2.054s61.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro2.027s (-50.6% 🟢)2.427s (-47.3% 🟢)0.400s501.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress2.357s (-40.9% 🟢)2.805s (-35.8% 🟢)0.448s431.16x
💻 LocalExpress2.663s (-71.1% 🟢)3.007s (-70.0% 🟢)0.345s401.31x
💻 LocalNitro2.681s (-71.2% 🟢)3.057s (-69.5% 🟢)0.376s401.32x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)3.156s4.009s0.853s301.56x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)3.772s4.008s0.236s301.86x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro28.757s (-70.3% 🟢)31.108s (-68.4% 🟢)2.351s41.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.178s (-37.2% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.829s601.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.212s (-25.0% 🟢)1.009s (~)0.797s601.19x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.228s1.006s0.778s601.28x
💻 LocalExpress0.386s (-31.1% 🟢)1.004s (~)0.618s602.17x
💻 LocalNitro0.400s (-33.8% 🟢)1.004s (-1.7%)0.603s602.25x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)0.540s1.022s0.481s593.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.386s (+43.6% 🔺)4.141s (+23.6% 🔺)1.755s151.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.293s (-41.0% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.713s901.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.436s1.017s0.581s891.49x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.506s (-0.8%)1.059s (+5.3% 🔺)0.553s851.73x
💻 LocalExpress2.114s (-15.9% 🟢)2.609s (-13.3% 🟢)0.495s357.21x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.144s3.009s0.865s307.32x
💻 LocalNitro2.195s (-13.5% 🟢)2.715s (-9.8% 🟢)0.520s347.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.705s (+76.9% 🔺)7.417s (+53.8% 🔺)1.712s131.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.612s (-22.5% 🟢)1.006s (~)0.394s1201.00x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.675s (-17.5% 🟢)1.126s (+10.7% 🔺)0.451s1081.10x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.854s1.014s0.160s1191.40x
💻 LocalExpress9.710s (-13.2% 🟢)10.196s (-14.6% 🟢)0.486s1215.86x
💻 LocalNitro10.037s (-10.3% 🟢)10.607s (-9.1% 🟢)0.570s1216.40x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)10.567s11.302s0.735s1117.26x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro18.721s (+142.4% 🔺)20.770s (+120.9% 🔺)2.049s71.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Stream Benchmarks(includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Express1.130s (+450.9% 🔺)2.001s (+100.4% 🔺)0.001s (-43.8% 🟢)2.009s (+98.6% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
🐘 PostgresNitro1.131s (+451.9% 🔺)1.999s (+100.0% 🔺)0.001s (-26.7% 🟢)2.010s (+98.8% 🔺)0.879s101.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.132s (+429.6% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.012s (-0.8%)2.019s (+98.2% 🔺)0.887s101.00x
💻 LocalExpress1.135s (+470.2% 🔺)2.005s (+99.6% 🔺)0.010s (-14.9% 🟢)2.017s (+98.2% 🔺)0.882s101.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.175s2.004s0.012s2.019s0.844s101.04x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.190s2.002s0.001s2.010s0.819s101.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro2.349s (-38.7% 🟢)3.724s (-29.4% 🟢)2.296s (+209.4% 🔺)6.531s (+0.7%)4.181s101.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.511s (+142.1% 🔺)2.003s (+98.9% 🔺)0.004s (-8.9% 🟢)2.025s (+98.1% 🔺)0.514s301.00x
💻 LocalNitro1.526s (+81.9% 🔺)2.011s (+98.7% 🔺)0.010s (+9.9% 🔺)2.023s (+81.3% 🔺)0.497s301.01x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.651s2.011s0.004s2.025s0.374s301.09x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.661s2.010s0.010s2.023s0.362s301.10x
💻 LocalExpress1.687s (+122.8% 🔺)2.009s (+95.3% 🔺)0.009s (-0.6%)2.200s (+111.6% 🔺)0.513s281.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.820s (+188.9% 🔺)2.264s (+124.9% 🔺)0.003s (-13.9% 🟢)2.286s (+123.5% 🔺)0.466s271.20x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro6.232s (-78.8% 🟢)7.686s (-75.1% 🟢)0.264s (+136.0% 🔺)8.452s (-73.4% 🟢)2.220s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro0.679s (-29.9% 🟢)1.029s (-17.6% 🟢)0.000s (-17.2% 🟢)1.045s (-16.9% 🟢)0.366s581.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)0.777s1.072s0.000s1.079s0.302s561.14x
🐘 PostgresExpress0.863s (-10.2% 🟢)1.246s (-2.5%)0.000s (+91.7% 🔺)1.263s (-3.3%)0.400s481.27x
💻 LocalExpress1.309s (+6.8% 🔺)2.016s (~)0.000s (-10.0% 🟢)2.018s (~)0.710s301.93x
💻 LocalNitro1.361s (+11.3% 🔺)2.015s (~)0.000s (~)2.017s (~)0.655s302.00x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)1.410s2.014s0.000s2.017s0.606s302.08x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro4.067s (+33.3% 🔺)5.097s (+16.0% 🔺)0.001s (+1672.7% 🔺)5.841s (+21.5% 🔺)1.774s111.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
🐘 Postgres🥇 Nitro1.307s (-27.0% 🟢)2.028s (-5.3% 🟢)0.000s (-100.0% 🟢)2.043s (-6.0% 🟢)0.736s301.00x
🐘 PostgresNext.js (Turbopack)1.463s2.106s0.000s2.138s0.675s291.12x
🐘 PostgresExpress1.593s (-10.1% 🟢)2.136s (-1.9%)0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺)2.162s (-1.7%)0.569s281.22x
💻 LocalNext.js (Turbopack)2.946s3.526s0.001s3.534s0.588s182.25x
💻 LocalExpress3.013s (-13.1% 🟢)3.672s (-9.0% 🟢)0.000s (-70.6% 🟢)3.679s (-8.9% 🟢)0.666s172.30x
💻 LocalNitro3.128s (-7.7% 🟢)3.968s (-1.6%)0.001s (-6.2% 🟢)3.971s (-1.6%)0.843s162.39x

▲ Production (Vercel)

WorldFrameworkWorkflow TimeTTFBSlurpWall TimeOverheadSamplesvs Fastest
▲ Vercel🥇 Nitro5.457s (+33.3% 🔺)7.314s (+36.1% 🔺)0.002s (+495.8% 🔺)7.778s (+34.3% 🔺)2.322s81.00x
▲ VercelExpress⚠️missing-----
▲ VercelNext.js (Turbopack)⚠️missing-----

🔍 Observability: Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World🥇 Fastest FrameworkWins
💻 LocalExpress11/21
🐘 PostgresNitro17/21
▲ VercelNitro21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework🥇 Fastest WorldWins
Express🐘 Postgres14/21
Next.js (Turbopack)🐘 Postgres15/21
Nitro🐘 Postgres18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production122112191441
✅ 💻 Local Development161502191834
✅ 📦 Local Production161502191834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161502191834
✅ 🪟 Windows13100131
✅ 📋 Other7410176917
Total6938110527991

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

sveltekit (1 failed):

  • DurableAgent e2e multimodal tool results passes through LanguageModelV3ToolResultOutput from tools

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro105026
✅ example105026
✅ express105026
✅ fastify105026
✅ hono105026
✅ nextjs-turbopack12902
✅ nextjs-webpack12902
✅ nitro105026
✅ nuxt105026
❌ sveltekit12317
✅ vite105026
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable106025
✅ express-stable106025
✅ fastify-stable106025
✅ hono-stable106025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary112019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled13100
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled13100
✅ nitro-stable106025
✅ nuxt-stable106025
✅ sveltekit-stable12506
✅ vite-stable106025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack13100
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable106025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-106025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start105026

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR customizes the Changesets GitHub changelog generator so that changeset entries created via the stable backport workflow are attributed to the original PR author (instead of the backport PR authored by github-actions[bot]), while still linking to the backport commit on the release branch.

Changes:

  • Switches Changesets config to use a local changelog generator wrapper instead of @changesets/changelog-github directly.
  • Adds .changeset/changelog.mjs wrapper that detects backport PRs (by title/body patterns) and injects pr: + commit: directives to force attribution to the original PR.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
.changeset/config.jsonPoints Changesets at the new local changelog generator wrapper.
.changeset/changelog.mjsImplements backport PR detection and summary rewriting before delegating to @changesets/changelog-github.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.changeset/changelog.mjs:182

  • Same issue here: logging ${err.message} can throw if a non-Error (or null/undefined) is thrown. Use a safe formatter (e.g. (err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err))) to ensure this fallback path never introduces a new failure.
 } catch (err) {
console.warn(
`[changelog] failed to look up PR #${prNumber}: ${err.message}`,
);

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
Comment thread.changeset/changelog.mjs
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
@TooTallNate
TooTallNate deleted the fix/changelog-backport-attribution branch May 22, 2026 18:02
github-actionsBot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport PR opened against stable: #2092. (backport job run)

TooTallNate pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
… (#2092)
* [ci] Attribute backport changelog entries to original PR author
`@changesets/changelog-github` resolves a changeset commit to its
associated PR via the GitHub GraphQL `associatedPullRequests` field. For
commits landed on `stable` via our backport workflow, that resolves to
the backport PR authored by `github-actions[bot]` (since the backport
workflow uses `createCommitOnBranch` to produce signed commits), so the
generated changelog ends up with "Thanks @github-actions!" instead of
the original contributor.
This adds a small `.changeset/changelog.mjs` wrapper around
`@changesets/changelog-github` that detects backport PRs by matching the
title (`Backport #N: ...`) or body (`Automated backport of #N to
` + '`stable`' + `...`) produced by `.github/workflows/backport.yml`, resolves the
original PR number, and injects `pr:`/`commit:` directives into the
changeset summary before delegating to the upstream generator. The
result is that the rendered changelog entry attributes the change to the
original PR and author, while the commit link still points at the
backport commit on the release branch.
* Address review feedback
- Use `Bearer` instead of `Token` for the GitHub GraphQL auth header
for consistency with the rest of the repo (Copilot review on PR #2091).
- Add a defensive `formatError` helper so `console.warn` in the catch
blocks doesn't itself throw when a non-Error value is thrown (Copilot
review on PR #2091).
Signed-off-by: Nathan Rajlich <n@n8.io>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious