[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632 - #2977

Closed
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632
Closed

[test] Benchmark replay paging with workflow-server #632#2977
NathanColosimo wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/benchmark-replay-page-server-632

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test-only combined benchmark

This draft layers the replay page-size change from #2975 on top of the exact workflow-server preview deployment for vercel/workflow-server#632.

WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE points to the preview for server commit 063557ca5565d9dc3b182f602372c0222a7c9379 so both the benchmark runner and deployed workbench route through the bounded event-query implementation.

This PR is not intended to merge. It exists only to run and retain the combined performance benchmark. The mergeable SDK change remains #2975.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: fbee45e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
NameType
@workflow/corePatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/vitestPatch
@workflow/web-sharedPatch
@workflow/webPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/astroPatch
@workflow/nestPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/rollupPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
@workflow/vitePatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

PassedFailedSkippedTotal
❌ ▲ Vercel Production145212301683
✅ 💻 Local Development161702191836
✅ 📦 Local Production161702191836
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres161702191836
✅ 🪟 Windows15300153
✅ 📋 Other89401771071
✅ vercel-multi-region270027
Total7377110648442

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (1 failed)

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race | wrun_41KXQ2EVSR0GGXDEESNCYV7522 | 🔍 observability

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro126027
✅ example126027
✅ express126027
✅ fastify126027
✅ hono126027
❌ nextjs-turbopack14913
✅ nextjs-webpack15003
✅ nitro126027
✅ nuxt126027
✅ sveltekit14508
✅ vite126027
✅ 💻 Local Development
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 📦 Local Production
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ astro-stable128025
✅ express-stable128025
✅ fastify-stable128025
✅ hono-stable128025
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable15300
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary134019
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable15300
✅ nitro-stable128025
✅ nuxt-stable128025
✅ sveltekit-stable14706
✅ vite-stable128025
✅ 🪟 Windows
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack15300
✅ 📋 Other
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable128025
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start-128025
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start126027
✅ vercel-multi-region
AppPassedFailedSkipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack2700

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit fbee45e · Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:52:59 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

MetricScenarioAvg (ms)P75 (ms)P90 (ms)P99 (ms)Samples
TTFSstream1456 (+34%)1626 🔴1657 🔴1740 🔴30
TTFShook + stream1601 (+12%)1898 🔴2090 🔴2223 🔴30
STSO1020 steps (1-20)287 (-4.9%)315 🔴375 🔴666 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (101-120)292 (-33%)311 🔴421 🔴458 🔴19
STSO1020 steps (1001-1020)716 (-16%)770 🔴819 🔴957 🔴19
WOstream1456 (+34%)16261657174030
WOhook + stream1601 (+12%)18982090222330
SLstream5000 (+6.8%)5022 🔴5771 🔴5874 🔴30
SLhook + stream4909 (+1.2%)5459 🔴5666 🔴5796 🔴30

Avg deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body execution · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (time outside step bodies, client start → last step body exit) · SL: stream latency (first chunk write → visible to the reader)

Scenarios — stream: one step that streams chunks back to the client; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode · hook + stream: registers a hook before the same streaming step, which exits turbo mode · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges

🟢/🔴 mark percentiles within/above target. Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600 · SL 50/60/125 · STSO (1-20) 20/30/60 · STSO (101-120) 30/45/90 · STSO (1001-1020) 40/60/120

TTFS/WO compare client vs deployment clocks and SL compares the step runner’s clock vs the client’s (NTP-synced in CI). WO ends at the last step body exit, the closest observable proxy for the final step-completion request.

@NathanColosimo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Benchmark complete. Results and trace-level analysis are recorded on workflow #2975 and workflow-server #632. Closing this test-only override PR; it is not intended to merge.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@NathanColosimo