Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions - #345

Merged
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions
Nov 16, 2025
Merged

Add support for step functions nested inside of workflow functions#345
TooTallNate merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions

Conversation

@TooTallNate

@TooTallNateTooTallNate commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions, improving the SWC plugin's ability to handle complex workflow patterns.

What changed?

  • Added support for nested step functions inside workflow functions
  • Implemented hoisting of nested step functions in step mode
  • Added tracking of default exports that need to be replaced with expressions
  • Refactored function processing logic into a dedicated process_stmt method
  • Fixed directive detection and removal in various contexts
  • Improved handling of workflow functions with both file-level and inline directives
  • Added conditional body replacement for workflow functions based on directive source
  • Added test cases for nested step functions in workflow functions

How to test?

  1. Create a workflow function with a nested step function:
exportasyncfunctionexample(a,b){"use workflow";asyncfunctionstep(a,b){"use step";returna+b;}constval=awaitstep(a,b);returnval;}
  1. Verify the output in different modes:
    • Step mode: The nested step function is hoisted to module level
    • Workflow mode: The nested step function is replaced with a proxy reference
    • Client mode: The workflow function throws an error when called directly

Why make this change?

This change enables more complex workflow patterns by allowing step functions to be defined inside workflow functions. Previously, all step functions had to be defined at the module level, which limited code organization options. With this change, developers can define step functions closer to where they're used, improving code readability and maintainability while still ensuring proper transformation for all execution modes.

@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 71cf4dd

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 10 packages
NameType
@workflow/swc-pluginPatch
@workflow/buildersPatch
@workflow/cliPatch
@workflow/nextPatch
@workflow/nitroPatch
@workflow/sveltekitPatch
workflowPatch
@workflow/world-testingPatch
@workflow/nuxtPatch
@workflow/aiPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercelBot commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentPreviewCommentsUpdated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpackReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
example-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-astro-workflowErrorErrorNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-hono-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nitro-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-nuxt-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-sveltekit-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workbench-vite-workflowReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am
workflow-docsReadyReadyPreviewCommentNov 15, 2025 7:37am

Comment threadpackages/swc-plugin-workflow/transform/src/lib.rs Outdated
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch from 528be20 to a2ddb2bCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:07
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 0c42601 to 21d0fecCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:08
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-13-add_support_for_step_functions_defined_as_object_properties branch 2 times, most recently from 577f570 to 48ddccbCompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
@TooTallNate
TooTallNateforce-pushed the 11-14-add_support_for_step_functions_nested_inside_of_workflow_functions branch from 21d0fec to 99d30e5CompareNovember 15, 2025 07:17
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@TooTallNate@VaguelySerious