Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was something I had mentioned elsewhere, that we shouldn't be accessing object properties in a
__dealloc__code path.Why is
_ptrstill being touched here?From the Cython docs on
__dealloc__:Why not just do the minimum C-API invocation required in
__dealloc__and duplicate whatever you need to fromclose?Then we're not going against the documented behavior and causing a crashing knowing that we could have avoided it all along.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
self._ptris a cdef attribute. I think it might be a confusion withself._ptr_obj?Regardless, I don't believe this PR is needed. I think #1104 and #1105 together should fix everything for us.