[17.0][MIG] base_name_search_improved: Migration to 17.0 - #2831
Conversation
|
Same comment as in #2833: any idea why |
|
Hi! I was wondering - is there still ongoing work on this? Does it work functionally? |
|
@thomaspaulb Hey! I really I don't know how to solve the problem of coverage because it is working fine in my computer |
|
cb2c6b5 to
bd3b119
Compare
|
@thomaspaulb Hey! thanks! Now it should be correct Regards |
bd3b119 to
dc1e352
Compare
dc1e352 to
2f4c3cc
Compare
2f4c3cc to
a91048f
Compare
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
|
@StefanRijnhart The merge process could not be finalized, because command |
|
Huh, looks like the README compilation is struggling with three images in two snippets. Can you play around to see if you can get it to work? |
a91048f to
6e1e404
Compare
6e1e404 to
bbbaff8
Compare
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
441e0e2 to
f1b908b
Compare
|
@StefanRijnhart Hey please disregard my previous message. I've tried to implement what you requested, but it didn't work properly. I added the translation in the smart_search field to false. I hope this solves the merge problem. |
|
@StefanRijnhart HI! Just a friendly reminder 😊 |
|
@StefanRijnhart Hi! I would like to ask you if you can check if its now ok |
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
| # TODO perhaps better to create only the field when enabled on the model | ||
| smart_search = fields.Char( | ||
| compute="_compute_smart_search", search="_search_smart_search", translate=False | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rov-adhoc how did you try to implement @StefanRijnhart's suggestion? I'd expect it to work to override _setup_fields, check via sql if the model has the functionality enabled, and if so, add the field to self._fields.
Just setting translate to False can't work because it's not about the translations of data from the field, but about things like its label.
|
@hbrunn your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2831-by-hbrunn-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
|
/ocabot migration base_name_search_improved |
|
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
|
@dreispt your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2831-by-dreispt-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
| def patch_name_search(): | ||
| @api.model | ||
| def _name_search( | ||
| self, name="", domain=None, operator="ilike", limit=100, order=None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The signature is incorrect, especially limit=100 gives incorrect results with domains like [("parent_id", "ilike", ...)])
|
Just checking in if something is holding this back from being merged? |
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 465fae1. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
No description provided.