Module fix for starfive_fb by sarnold · Pull Request #5 · esmil/linux

sarnold · 2021-05-14T03:00:28Z

No description provided.

[FIXME] why we can not do it in U-boot? [geert: Rebase to v5.13-rc1]

Note: including uSDK v0.9->v1.0 patch [geert: Rebase to v5.13-rc1] Warnings fixed by Matteo. Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>

drivers/usb/cdns3/ drivers/usb/core/ drivers/usb/host/ include/linux/usb.h [geert: Rebase to v5.13-rc1]

1, add ov5640&sc2235 drivers, update stf_isp 2, add MIPI/CSI/DSI drivers for VIC7100

… drivers

Fix sf_fb_map_video_memory in starfive_fb.c

Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

This IP is also used on the Starfive JH7100 riscv64 SoC and presumably also the upcoming JH7110 SoC. Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

Descriptor management was simplified with commit: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ef6fb2d6f1abd56cc067c694253ea362159b5ac3 Code added to dw-axi-dmac-platform driver due to VIC7100 Cache Coherency issues needed follow those changes. Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <mike@foundries.io>

The BeagleV Starlight v0.9 board doesn't have the IRQB line from the pmic routed to the SoC, so this hack is needed to allow the driver to be loaded without it. See beagleboard/beaglev-starlight#14 Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

This is the device tree from https://github.com/starfive-tech/u-boot/ Rearranged, cleanups, fixes and TPS65086 added by Emil. Cleanups, fixes and LED added by Geert. Signed-off-by: yanhong.wang <yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: Huan.Feng <huan.feng@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: ke.zhu <ke.zhu@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: yiming.li <yiming.li@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: jack.zhu <jack.zhu@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: Samin Guo <samin.guo@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: Chenjieqin <Jessica.Chen@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: bo.li <bo.li@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

For convenience this also adds a small starlight_defconfig and the firmware needed for the brcmfmac driver along with the signed regulatory database. The firmware is from the linux-firmware repo and the regulatory database from the wireless-regdb Fedora package. Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

[ Upstream commit bbd6f0a ] In bnxt_rx_pkt(), the RX buffers are expected to complete in order. If the RX consumer index indicates an out of order buffer completion, it means we are hitting a hardware bug and the driver will abort all remaining RX packets and reset the RX ring. The RX consumer index that we pass to bnxt_discard_rx() is not correct. We should be passing the current index (tmp_raw_cons) instead of the old index (raw_cons). This bug can cause us to be at the wrong index when trying to abort the next RX packet. It can crash like this: #0 [ffff9bbcdf5c39a8] machine_kexec at ffffffff9b05e007 #1 [ffff9bbcdf5c3a00] __crash_kexec at ffffffff9b111232 #2 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ad0] panic at ffffffff9b07d61e #3 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b50] oops_end at ffffffff9b030978 #4 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b78] no_context at ffffffff9b06aaf0 #5 [ffff9bbcdf5c3bd8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06ae2e #6 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c28] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06af24 #7 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c38] __do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06b67e #8 [ffff9bbcdf5c3cb0] do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06bb12 #9 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ce0] page_fault at ffffffff9bc015c5 [exception RIP: bnxt_rx_pkt+237] RIP: ffffffffc0259cdd RSP: ffff9bbcdf5c3d98 RFLAGS: 00010213 RAX: 000000005dd8097f RBX: ffff9ba4cb11b7e0 RCX: ffffa923cf6e9000 RDX: 0000000000000fff RSI: 0000000000000627 RDI: 0000000000001000 RBP: ffff9bbcdf5c3e60 R8: 0000000000420003 R9: 000000000000020d R10: ffffa923cf6ec138 R11: ffff9bbcdf5c3e83 R12: ffff9ba4d6f928c0 R13: ffff9ba4cac28080 R14: ffff9ba4cb11b7f0 R15: ffff9ba4d5a30000 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 Fixes: a1b0e4e ("bnxt_en: Improve RX consumer index validity check.") Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

sarnold · 2021-05-14T19:47:40Z

Lemme fix this (actually I didn't want that first commit on this branch).

Signed-off-by: Stephen L Arnold <nerdboy@gentoo.org>

esmil · 2021-05-14T19:52:56Z

Hi Steve. Thanks for the fix. Yeah, I was going to ask if you'd tried the starlight_defconfig I added here. I can just cherry-pick the module fix if that's easier.

sarnold · 2021-05-14T19:55:19Z

Already done ;)

esmil · 2021-05-14T20:02:14Z

Great thanks! I ended up reordering the commits anyway. Hope you don't mind.

Commit 4af22de ("arc: fix memory initialization for systems with two memory banks") fixed highmem, but for the PAE case it causes bug messages: | BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:80000 | page:(ptrval) refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x80000 flags: 0x0() | raw: 00000000 00000100 00000122 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 | raw: 00000000 | page dumped because: nonzero mapcount | Modules linked in: | CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-00003-g1e43c377a79f #1 This is because the fix expects highmem to be always less than lowmem and uses min_low_pfn as an upper zone border for highmem. max_high_pfn should be ok for both highmem and highmem+PAE cases. Fixes: 4af22de ("arc: fix memory initialization for systems with two memory banks") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Isaev <isaev@synopsys.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.8 onwards Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

…rallel [ Upstream commit b168e1d ] We got a warning message below. When server tries to close one session by force, it locks the sysfs interface and locks the srv_sess lock. The problem is that client can send a request to close at the same time. By close request, server locks the srv_sess lock and locks the sysfs to remove the sysfs interfaces. The simplest way to prevent that situation could be just use mutex_trylock. [ 234.153965] ====================================================== [ 234.154093] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 234.154219] 5.4.84-storage esmil#5.4.84-1+feature+linux+5.4.y+dbg+20201216.1319+b6b887b~deb10 Tainted: G O [ 234.154381] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 234.154531] kworker/1:1H/618 is trying to acquire lock: [ 234.154651] ffff8887a09db0a8 (kn->count#132){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.154819] but task is already holding lock: [ 234.154965] ffff8887ae5f6518 (&srv_sess->lock){+.+.}, at: rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x144/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.155132] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 234.155311] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 234.155462] -> esmil#1 (&srv_sess->lock){+.+.}: [ 234.155614] __mutex_lock+0x134/0xcb0 [ 234.155761] rnbd_srv_sess_dev_force_close+0x36/0x50 [rnbd_server] [ 234.155889] rnbd_srv_dev_session_force_close_store+0x69/0xc0 [rnbd_server] [ 234.156042] kernfs_fop_write+0x13f/0x240 [ 234.156162] vfs_write+0xf3/0x280 [ 234.156278] ksys_write+0xba/0x150 [ 234.156395] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x270 [ 234.156513] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 234.156632] -> #0 (kn->count#132){++++}: [ 234.156782] __lock_acquire+0x129e/0x23a0 [ 234.156900] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x210 [ 234.157043] __kernfs_remove+0x42b/0x4c0 [ 234.157161] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.157282] remove_files+0x3f/0xa0 [ 234.157399] sysfs_remove_group+0x4a/0xb0 [ 234.157519] rnbd_srv_destroy_dev_session_sysfs+0x19/0x30 [rnbd_server] [ 234.157648] rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x14c/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.157775] process_io_req+0x29a/0x6a0 [rtrs_server] [ 234.157924] __ib_process_cq+0x8c/0x100 [ib_core] [ 234.158709] ib_cq_poll_work+0x31/0xb0 [ib_core] [ 234.158834] process_one_work+0x4e5/0xaa0 [ 234.158958] worker_thread+0x65/0x5c0 [ 234.159078] kthread+0x1e0/0x200 [ 234.159194] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 234.159309] other info that might help us debug this: [ 234.159513] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 234.159658] CPU0 CPU1 [ 234.159775] ---- ---- [ 234.159891] lock(&srv_sess->lock); [ 234.160005] lock(kn->count#132); [ 234.160128] lock(&srv_sess->lock); [ 234.160250] lock(kn->count#132); [ 234.160364] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 234.160536] 3 locks held by kworker/1:1H/618: [ 234.160677] #0: ffff8883ca1ed528 ((wq_completion)ib-comp-wq){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x40a/0xaa0 [ 234.160840] esmil#1: ffff8883d2d5fe10 ((work_completion)(&cq->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x40a/0xaa0 [ 234.161003] esmil#2: ffff8887ae5f6518 (&srv_sess->lock){+.+.}, at: rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x144/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.161168] stack backtrace: [ 234.161312] CPU: 1 PID: 618 Comm: kworker/1:1H Tainted: G O 5.4.84-storage esmil#5.4.84-1+feature+linux+5.4.y+dbg+20201216.1319+b6b887b~deb10 [ 234.161490] Hardware name: Supermicro H8QG6/H8QG6, BIOS 3.00 09/04/2012 [ 234.161643] Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core] [ 234.161765] Call Trace: [ 234.161910] dump_stack+0x96/0xe0 [ 234.162028] check_noncircular+0x29e/0x2e0 [ 234.162148] ? print_circular_bug+0x100/0x100 [ 234.162267] ? register_lock_class+0x1ad/0x8a0 [ 234.162385] ? __lock_acquire+0x68e/0x23a0 [ 234.162505] ? trace_event_raw_event_lock+0x190/0x190 [ 234.162626] __lock_acquire+0x129e/0x23a0 [ 234.162746] ? register_lock_class+0x8a0/0x8a0 [ 234.162866] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x210 [ 234.162982] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.163127] __kernfs_remove+0x42b/0x4c0 [ 234.163243] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.163363] ? kernfs_fop_readdir+0x3b0/0x3b0 [ 234.163482] ? strlen+0x1f/0x40 [ 234.163596] ? strcmp+0x30/0x50 [ 234.163712] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.163832] remove_files+0x3f/0xa0 [ 234.163948] sysfs_remove_group+0x4a/0xb0 [ 234.164068] rnbd_srv_destroy_dev_session_sysfs+0x19/0x30 [rnbd_server] [ 234.164196] rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x14c/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.164345] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x43/0x50 [ 234.164466] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x1a8/0x290 [ 234.164597] ? mlx4_ib_poll_cq+0x927/0x1280 [mlx4_ib] [ 234.164732] ? rnbd_get_sess_dev+0x270/0x270 [rnbd_server] [ 234.164859] process_io_req+0x29a/0x6a0 [rtrs_server] [ 234.164982] ? rnbd_get_sess_dev+0x270/0x270 [rnbd_server] [ 234.165130] __ib_process_cq+0x8c/0x100 [ib_core] [ 234.165279] ib_cq_poll_work+0x31/0xb0 [ib_core] [ 234.165404] process_one_work+0x4e5/0xaa0 [ 234.165550] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x160/0x160 [ 234.165675] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x119/0x1d0 [ 234.165796] worker_thread+0x65/0x5c0 [ 234.165914] ? process_one_work+0xaa0/0xaa0 [ 234.166031] kthread+0x1e0/0x200 [ 234.166147] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 [ 234.166268] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 234.251591] rnbd_server L243: </dev/loop1@close_device_session>: Device closed [ 234.604221] rnbd_server L264: RTRS Session close_device_session disconnected Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210419073722.15351-10-gi-oh.kim@ionos.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 #3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 #4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 #5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 #6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 #7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 #8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 #9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 #10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 #11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 #12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 #13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 #15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 #17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame #2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> CC: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210719145332.29747-1-mpetlan@redhat.com Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

FD uses xyarray__entry that may return NULL if an index is out of bounds. If NULL is returned then a segv happens as FD unconditionally dereferences the pointer. This was happening in a case of with perf iostat as shown below. The fix is to make FD an "int*" rather than an int and handle the NULL case as either invalid input or a closed fd. $ sudo gdb --args perf stat --iostat list ... Breakpoint 1, perf_evsel__alloc_fd (evsel=0x5555560951a0, ncpus=1, nthreads=1) at evsel.c:50 50 { (gdb) bt #0 perf_evsel__alloc_fd (evsel=0x5555560951a0, ncpus=1, nthreads=1) at evsel.c:50 #1 0x000055555585c188 in evsel__open_cpu (evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpus=0x555556093410, threads=0x555556086fb0, start_cpu=0, end_cpu=1) at util/evsel.c:1792 #2 0x000055555585cfb2 in evsel__open (evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpus=0x0, threads=0x555556086fb0) at util/evsel.c:2045 #3 0x000055555585d0db in evsel__open_per_thread (evsel=0x5555560951a0, threads=0x555556086fb0) at util/evsel.c:2065 #4 0x00005555558ece64 in create_perf_stat_counter (evsel=0x5555560951a0, config=0x555555c34700 <stat_config>, target=0x555555c2f1c0 <target>, cpu=0) at util/stat.c:590 #5 0x000055555578e927 in __run_perf_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0, run_idx=0) at builtin-stat.c:833 #6 0x000055555578f3c6 in run_perf_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0, run_idx=0) at builtin-stat.c:1048 #7 0x0000555555792ee5 in cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at builtin-stat.c:2534 #8 0x0000555555835ed3 in run_builtin (p=0x555555c3f540 <commands+288>, argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:313 #9 0x0000555555836154 in handle_internal_command (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:365 #10 0x000055555583629f in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffe2ec, argv=0x7fffffffe2e0) at perf.c:409 #11 0x0000555555836692 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:539 ... (gdb) c Continuing. Error: The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (uncore_iio_0/event=0x83,umask=0x04,ch_mask=0xF,fc_mask=0x07/). /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00005555559b03ea in perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu (evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpu=1) at evsel.c:166 166 if (FD(evsel, cpu, thread) >= 0) v3. fixes a bug in perf_evsel__run_ioctl where the sense of a branch was backward. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210918054440.2350466-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

On SiFive Unmatched, I recently fell onto the following BUG when booting: [ 0.000000] ftrace: allocating 36610 entries in 144 pages [ 0.000000] Oops - illegal instruction [#1] [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.13.1+ #5 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00 (DT) [ 0.000000] epc : riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] ra : __sbi_rfence_v02+0xc8/0x10a [ 0.000000] epc : ffffffff80007240 ra : ffffffff80009964 sp : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] gp : ffffffff81a1ea70 tp : ffffffff8180f500 t0 : ffffffe07fe30000 [ 0.000000] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffff81803e60 [ 0.000000] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ffffffff81a22238 a1 : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffff8000989c a7 : 0000000052464e43 [ 0.000000] s2 : ffffffff81a220c8 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000200000100 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 0.000000] s8 : ffffffe07fe04040 s9 : ffffffff81a22c80 s10: 0000000000001000 [ 0.000000] s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : 0000000000000008 [ 0.000000] t5 : ffffffcf04000808 t6 : ffffffe3ffddf188 [ 0.000000] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000002 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80007240>] riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80009474>] sbi_remote_fence_i+0x1e/0x26 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000b8f4>] flush_icache_all+0x12/0x1a [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000666c>] patch_text_nosync+0x26/0x32 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000884e>] ftrace_init_nop+0x52/0x8c [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff800f051e>] ftrace_process_locs.isra.0+0x29c/0x360 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a0e3c6>] ftrace_init+0x80/0x130 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a00f8c>] start_kernel+0x5c4/0x8f6 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f67eb9af4d8d492b ]--- [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]--- While ftrace is looping over a list of addresses to patch, it always failed when patching the same function: riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask. Looking at the backtrace, the illegal instruction is encountered in this same function. However, patch_text_nosync, after patching the instructions, calls flush_icache_range. But looking at what happens in this function: flush_icache_range -> flush_icache_all -> sbi_remote_fence_i -> __sbi_rfence_v02 -> riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask The icache and dcache of the current cpu are never synchronized between the patching of riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask and calling this same function. So fix this by flushing the current cpu's icache before asking for the other cpus to do the same. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>

Following test case reproduces lockdep warning. Test case: $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1> $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1> $ mount <dev1> <mnt> $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f $ umount <mnt> $ mount <dev2> <mnt> $ umount <mnt> The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount. [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock: [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock: [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}: [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0 [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs] [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs] [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs] [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs] [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs] [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140 [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360 [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0 [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80 [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30 [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs] [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs] [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100 [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs] [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070 [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0 [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160 [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this: [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 540.744553] CPU0 CPU1 [ 540.744554] ---- ---- [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744557] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744560] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744564] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515: [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450 [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.744708] stack backtrace: [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as explained below. Two threads [1] and [2] (below) could lead to clone_fs_device(). [1] open_ctree <== mount sprout fs btrfs_read_chunk_tree() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock read_one_dev() open_seed_devices() clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices [2] btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock btrfs_prepare_sprout() lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs uuid_mutex. So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices(). And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in clone_fs_devices(). Reported-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP && CONFIG_MTD (at least; there might be other combinations), lockdep complains circular locking dependency at __loop_clr_fd(), for major_names_lock serves as a locking dependency aggregating hub across multiple block modules. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0+ #757 Tainted: G E ------------------------------------------------------ systemd-udevd/7568 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88800f334d48 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 but task is already holding lock: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x17/0x20 lo_open+0x23/0x50 [loop] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x199/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #5 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 bd_register_pending_holders+0x20/0x100 device_add_disk+0x1ae/0x390 loop_add+0x29c/0x2d0 [loop] blk_request_module+0x5a/0xb0 blkdev_get_no_open+0x27/0xa0 blkdev_get_by_dev+0x5f/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 blkdev_show+0x19/0x80 devinfo_show+0x52/0x60 seq_read_iter+0x2d5/0x3e0 proc_reg_read_iter+0x41/0x80 vfs_read+0x2ac/0x330 ksys_read+0x6b/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 seq_read_iter+0x37/0x3e0 generic_file_splice_read+0xf3/0x170 splice_direct_to_actor+0x14e/0x350 do_splice_direct+0x84/0xd0 do_sendfile+0x263/0x430 __se_sys_sendfile64+0x96/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 lo_write_bvec+0x96/0x280 [loop] loop_process_work+0xa68/0xc10 [loop] process_one_work+0x293/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 process_one_work+0x280/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by systemd-udevd/7568: #0: ffff888012554128 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x4c/0x1d0 #1: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7568 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G E 5.14.0+ #757 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xbf print_circular_bug+0x5d6/0x5e0 ? stack_trace_save+0x42/0x60 ? save_trace+0x3d/0x2d0 check_noncircular+0x10b/0x120 validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xe/0x1a0 ? drain_workqueue+0x41/0x140 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 ? blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0xac/0xd0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x35/0x230 blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f0fd4c661f7 Code: 00 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 c3 48 83 ec 18 89 7c 24 0c e8 13 fc ff ff RSP: 002b:00007ffd1c9e9fd8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0fd46be6c8 RCX: 00007f0fd4c661f7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 0000000000000006 R08: 000055fff1eaf400 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f0fd46be6c8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000002f08 R15: 00007ffd1c9ea050 Commit 1c500ad ("loop: reduce the loop_ctl_mutex scope") is for breaking "loop_ctl_mutex => &lo->lo_mutex" dependency chain. But enabling a different block module results in forming circular locking dependency due to shared major_names_lock mutex. The simplest fix is to call probe function without holding major_names_lock [1], but Christoph Hellwig does not like such idea. Therefore, instead of holding major_names_lock in blkdev_show(), introduce a different lock for blkdev_show() in order to break "sb_writers#$N => &p->lock => major_names_lock" dependency chain. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b2af8a5b-3c1b-204e-7f56-bea0b15848d6@i-love.sakura.ne.jp [1] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/18a02da2-0bf3-550e-b071-2b4ab13c49f0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

commit 13be2ef upstream. As previously noted in commit 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"): <4>[ 254.192378] WARNING: inconsistent lock state <4>[ 254.192384] 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 Not tainted <4>[ 254.192396] -------------------------------- <4>[ 254.192400] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. <4>[ 254.192409] rtcwake/5309 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: <4>[ 254.192429] ffffffff8263c5f8 (rtc_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.192481] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: <4>[ 254.192488] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.192504] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 254.192519] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.192536] rtc_handler+0x1f/0xc0 <4>[ 254.192553] acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0x109/0x13c <4>[ 254.192574] acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0xb/0x28 <4>[ 254.192596] acpi_irq+0x13/0x30 <4>[ 254.192620] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 <4>[ 254.192641] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 254.192661] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 254.192680] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9e/0x150 <4>[ 254.192693] __common_interrupt+0x76/0x140 <4>[ 254.192715] common_interrupt+0x96/0xc0 <4>[ 254.192732] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 <4>[ 254.192750] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x60 <4>[ 254.192767] resume_irqs+0xba/0xf0 <4>[ 254.192786] dpm_resume_noirq+0x245/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.192811] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x230/0xaa0 <4>[ 254.192835] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a <4>[ 254.192859] state_store+0x7b/0xe0 <4>[ 254.192879] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.192899] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0 <4>[ 254.192916] vfs_write+0x265/0x390 <4>[ 254.192933] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.192949] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 <4>[ 254.192965] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae <4>[ 254.192986] irq event stamp: 43775 <4>[ 254.192994] hardirqs last enabled at (43775): [<ffffffff81c00c42>] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 <4>[ 254.193023] hardirqs last disabled at (43774): [<ffffffff81aa691a>] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0xb0 <4>[ 254.193049] softirqs last enabled at (42548): [<ffffffff81e00342>] __do_softirq+0x342/0x48e <4>[ 254.193074] softirqs last disabled at (42543): [<ffffffff810b45fd>] irq_exit_rcu+0xad/0xd0 <4>[ 254.193101] other info that might help us debug this: <4>[ 254.193107] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4>[ 254.193112] CPU0 <4>[ 254.193117] ---- <4>[ 254.193121] lock(rtc_lock); <4>[ 254.193137] <Interrupt> <4>[ 254.193142] lock(rtc_lock); <4>[ 254.193156] *** DEADLOCK *** <4>[ 254.193161] 6 locks held by rtcwake/5309: <4>[ 254.193174] #0: ffff888104861430 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.193232] #1: ffff88810f823288 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe7/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.193282] #2: ffff888100cef3c0 (kn->active#285 <7>[ 254.192706] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_modeset_setup_hw_state [i915]] [CRTC:51:pipe A] hw state readout: disabled <4>[ 254.193307] ){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf0/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.193333] #3: ffffffff82649fa8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend.cold.8+0xce/0x34a <4>[ 254.193387] #4: ffffffff827a2108 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x47/0x70 <4>[ 254.193433] #5: ffff8881019ea178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_resume+0x68/0x1e0 <4>[ 254.193485] stack backtrace: <4>[ 254.193492] CPU: 1 PID: 5309 Comm: rtcwake Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 <4>[ 254.193514] Hardware name: Google Soraka/Soraka, BIOS MrChromebox-4.10 08/25/2019 <4>[ 254.193524] Call Trace: <4>[ 254.193536] dump_stack+0x7f/0xad <4>[ 254.193567] mark_lock.part.47+0x8ca/0xce0 <4>[ 254.193604] __lock_acquire+0x39b/0x2590 <4>[ 254.193626] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 <4>[ 254.193660] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.193677] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193716] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 254.193735] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193758] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193785] cmos_resume+0x2ac/0x2d0 <4>[ 254.193813] ? acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup+0x1f/0x110 <4>[ 254.193842] ? pnp_bus_suspend+0x10/0x10 <4>[ 254.193864] pnp_bus_resume+0x5e/0x90 <4>[ 254.193885] dpm_run_callback+0x5f/0x240 <4>[ 254.193914] device_resume+0xb2/0x1e0 <4>[ 254.193942] ? pm_dev_err+0x25/0x25 <4>[ 254.193974] dpm_resume+0xea/0x3f0 <4>[ 254.194005] dpm_resume_end+0x8/0x10 <4>[ 254.194030] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x29b/0xaa0 <4>[ 254.194066] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a <4>[ 254.194094] state_store+0x7b/0xe0 <4>[ 254.194124] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.194151] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0 <4>[ 254.194183] vfs_write+0x265/0x390 <4>[ 254.194207] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.194232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 <4>[ 254.194251] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae <4>[ 254.194274] RIP: 0033:0x7f07d79691e7 <4>[ 254.194293] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 <4>[ 254.194312] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9cc2c768 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 <4>[ 254.194337] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f07d79691e7 <4>[ 254.194352] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000556ebfc63590 RDI: 000000000000000b <4>[ 254.194366] RBP: 0000556ebfc63590 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000004 <4>[ 254.194379] R10: 0000556ebf0ec2a6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 which breaks S3-resume on fi-kbl-soraka presumably as that's slow enough to trigger the alarm during the suspend. Fixes: 6950d04 ("rtc: cmos: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ") References: 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"): Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210305122140.28774-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 57f0ff0 upstream. It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 #3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 #4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 #5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 #6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 #7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 #8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 #9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 #10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 #11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 #12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 #13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 #15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 #17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame #2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> CC: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/20210719145332.29747-1-mpetlan@redhat.com Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

On SiFive Unmatched, I recently fell onto the following BUG when booting: [ 0.000000] ftrace: allocating 36610 entries in 144 pages [ 0.000000] Oops - illegal instruction [#1] [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.13.1+ #5 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00 (DT) [ 0.000000] epc : riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] ra : __sbi_rfence_v02+0xc8/0x10a [ 0.000000] epc : ffffffff80007240 ra : ffffffff80009964 sp : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] gp : ffffffff81a1ea70 tp : ffffffff8180f500 t0 : ffffffe07fe30000 [ 0.000000] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffff81803e60 [ 0.000000] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ffffffff81a22238 a1 : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffff8000989c a7 : 0000000052464e43 [ 0.000000] s2 : ffffffff81a220c8 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000200000100 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 0.000000] s8 : ffffffe07fe04040 s9 : ffffffff81a22c80 s10: 0000000000001000 [ 0.000000] s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : 0000000000000008 [ 0.000000] t5 : ffffffcf04000808 t6 : ffffffe3ffddf188 [ 0.000000] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000002 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80007240>] riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80009474>] sbi_remote_fence_i+0x1e/0x26 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000b8f4>] flush_icache_all+0x12/0x1a [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000666c>] patch_text_nosync+0x26/0x32 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000884e>] ftrace_init_nop+0x52/0x8c [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff800f051e>] ftrace_process_locs.isra.0+0x29c/0x360 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a0e3c6>] ftrace_init+0x80/0x130 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a00f8c>] start_kernel+0x5c4/0x8f6 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f67eb9af4d8d492b ]--- [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]--- While ftrace is looping over a list of addresses to patch, it always failed when patching the same function: riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask. Looking at the backtrace, the illegal instruction is encountered in this same function. However, patch_text_nosync, after patching the instructions, calls flush_icache_range. But looking at what happens in this function: flush_icache_range -> flush_icache_all -> sbi_remote_fence_i -> __sbi_rfence_v02 -> riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask The icache and dcache of the current cpu are never synchronized between the patching of riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask and calling this same function. So fix this by flushing the current cpu's icache before asking for the other cpus to do the same. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>

[ Upstream commit c124706 ] Following test case reproduces lockdep warning. Test case: $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1> $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1> $ mount <dev1> <mnt> $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f $ umount <mnt> $ mount <dev2> <mnt> $ umount <mnt> The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount. [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock: [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock: [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}: [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0 [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs] [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs] [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs] [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs] [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs] [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140 [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360 [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0 [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80 [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30 [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs] [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs] [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100 [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs] [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070 [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0 [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160 [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this: [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 540.744553] CPU0 CPU1 [ 540.744554] ---- ---- [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744557] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744560] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744564] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515: [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450 [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.744708] stack backtrace: [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as explained below. Two threads [1] and [2] (below) could lead to clone_fs_device(). [1] open_ctree <== mount sprout fs btrfs_read_chunk_tree() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock read_one_dev() open_seed_devices() clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices [2] btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock btrfs_prepare_sprout() lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs uuid_mutex. So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices(). And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in clone_fs_devices(). Reported-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit dfbb340 ] If CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP && CONFIG_MTD (at least; there might be other combinations), lockdep complains circular locking dependency at __loop_clr_fd(), for major_names_lock serves as a locking dependency aggregating hub across multiple block modules. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0+ #757 Tainted: G E ------------------------------------------------------ systemd-udevd/7568 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88800f334d48 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 but task is already holding lock: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x17/0x20 lo_open+0x23/0x50 [loop] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x199/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #5 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 bd_register_pending_holders+0x20/0x100 device_add_disk+0x1ae/0x390 loop_add+0x29c/0x2d0 [loop] blk_request_module+0x5a/0xb0 blkdev_get_no_open+0x27/0xa0 blkdev_get_by_dev+0x5f/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 blkdev_show+0x19/0x80 devinfo_show+0x52/0x60 seq_read_iter+0x2d5/0x3e0 proc_reg_read_iter+0x41/0x80 vfs_read+0x2ac/0x330 ksys_read+0x6b/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 seq_read_iter+0x37/0x3e0 generic_file_splice_read+0xf3/0x170 splice_direct_to_actor+0x14e/0x350 do_splice_direct+0x84/0xd0 do_sendfile+0x263/0x430 __se_sys_sendfile64+0x96/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 lo_write_bvec+0x96/0x280 [loop] loop_process_work+0xa68/0xc10 [loop] process_one_work+0x293/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 process_one_work+0x280/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by systemd-udevd/7568: #0: ffff888012554128 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x4c/0x1d0 #1: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7568 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G E 5.14.0+ #757 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xbf print_circular_bug+0x5d6/0x5e0 ? stack_trace_save+0x42/0x60 ? save_trace+0x3d/0x2d0 check_noncircular+0x10b/0x120 validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xe/0x1a0 ? drain_workqueue+0x41/0x140 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 ? blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0xac/0xd0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x35/0x230 blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f0fd4c661f7 Code: 00 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 c3 48 83 ec 18 89 7c 24 0c e8 13 fc ff ff RSP: 002b:00007ffd1c9e9fd8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0fd46be6c8 RCX: 00007f0fd4c661f7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 0000000000000006 R08: 000055fff1eaf400 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f0fd46be6c8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000002f08 R15: 00007ffd1c9ea050 Commit 1c500ad ("loop: reduce the loop_ctl_mutex scope") is for breaking "loop_ctl_mutex => &lo->lo_mutex" dependency chain. But enabling a different block module results in forming circular locking dependency due to shared major_names_lock mutex. The simplest fix is to call probe function without holding major_names_lock [1], but Christoph Hellwig does not like such idea. Therefore, instead of holding major_names_lock in blkdev_show(), introduce a different lock for blkdev_show() in order to break "sb_writers#$N => &p->lock => major_names_lock" dependency chain. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b2af8a5b-3c1b-204e-7f56-bea0b15848d6@i-love.sakura.ne.jp [1] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/18a02da2-0bf3-550e-b071-2b4ab13c49f0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

On SiFive Unmatched, I recently fell onto the following BUG when booting: [ 0.000000] ftrace: allocating 36610 entries in 144 pages [ 0.000000] Oops - illegal instruction [#1] [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.13.1+ #5 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00 (DT) [ 0.000000] epc : riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] ra : __sbi_rfence_v02+0xc8/0x10a [ 0.000000] epc : ffffffff80007240 ra : ffffffff80009964 sp : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] gp : ffffffff81a1ea70 tp : ffffffff8180f500 t0 : ffffffe07fe30000 [ 0.000000] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffff81803e60 [ 0.000000] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ffffffff81a22238 a1 : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffff8000989c a7 : 0000000052464e43 [ 0.000000] s2 : ffffffff81a220c8 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000200000100 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 0.000000] s8 : ffffffe07fe04040 s9 : ffffffff81a22c80 s10: 0000000000001000 [ 0.000000] s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : 0000000000000008 [ 0.000000] t5 : ffffffcf04000808 t6 : ffffffe3ffddf188 [ 0.000000] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000002 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80007240>] riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80009474>] sbi_remote_fence_i+0x1e/0x26 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000b8f4>] flush_icache_all+0x12/0x1a [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000666c>] patch_text_nosync+0x26/0x32 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000884e>] ftrace_init_nop+0x52/0x8c [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff800f051e>] ftrace_process_locs.isra.0+0x29c/0x360 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a0e3c6>] ftrace_init+0x80/0x130 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a00f8c>] start_kernel+0x5c4/0x8f6 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f67eb9af4d8d492b ]--- [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]--- While ftrace is looping over a list of addresses to patch, it always failed when patching the same function: riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask. Looking at the backtrace, the illegal instruction is encountered in this same function. However, patch_text_nosync, after patching the instructions, calls flush_icache_range. But looking at what happens in this function: flush_icache_range -> flush_icache_all -> sbi_remote_fence_i -> __sbi_rfence_v02 -> riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask The icache and dcache of the current cpu are never synchronized between the patching of riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask and calling this same function. So fix this by flushing the current cpu's icache before asking for the other cpus to do the same. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>

Peter's e-mail in MAINTAINERS is defunct: This is the qmail-send program at a.mx.sunsite.dk. <jacmet@sunsite.dk>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) Peter says: ** Ahh yes, it should be changed to peter@korsgaard.com. However he also says: ** I haven't had access to c67x00 hw for quite some years though, so maybe ** it should be marked Orphan instead? So change as he wishes. Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210922063008.25758-1-jslaby@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

On SiFive Unmatched, I recently fell onto the following BUG when booting: [ 0.000000] ftrace: allocating 36610 entries in 144 pages [ 0.000000] Oops - illegal instruction [#1] [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.13.1+ #5 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00 (DT) [ 0.000000] epc : riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] ra : __sbi_rfence_v02+0xc8/0x10a [ 0.000000] epc : ffffffff80007240 ra : ffffffff80009964 sp : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] gp : ffffffff81a1ea70 tp : ffffffff8180f500 t0 : ffffffe07fe30000 [ 0.000000] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffff81803e60 [ 0.000000] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ffffffff81a22238 a1 : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffff8000989c a7 : 0000000052464e43 [ 0.000000] s2 : ffffffff81a220c8 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000200000100 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 0.000000] s8 : ffffffe07fe04040 s9 : ffffffff81a22c80 s10: 0000000000001000 [ 0.000000] s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : 0000000000000008 [ 0.000000] t5 : ffffffcf04000808 t6 : ffffffe3ffddf188 [ 0.000000] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000002 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80007240>] riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80009474>] sbi_remote_fence_i+0x1e/0x26 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000b8f4>] flush_icache_all+0x12/0x1a [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000666c>] patch_text_nosync+0x26/0x32 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000884e>] ftrace_init_nop+0x52/0x8c [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff800f051e>] ftrace_process_locs.isra.0+0x29c/0x360 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a0e3c6>] ftrace_init+0x80/0x130 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a00f8c>] start_kernel+0x5c4/0x8f6 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f67eb9af4d8d492b ]--- [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]--- While ftrace is looping over a list of addresses to patch, it always failed when patching the same function: riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask. Looking at the backtrace, the illegal instruction is encountered in this same function. However, patch_text_nosync, after patching the instructions, calls flush_icache_range. But looking at what happens in this function: flush_icache_range -> flush_icache_all -> sbi_remote_fence_i -> __sbi_rfence_v02 -> riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask The icache and dcache of the current cpu are never synchronized between the patching of riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask and calling this same function. So fix this by flushing the current cpu's icache before asking for the other cpus to do the same. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>

On SiFive Unmatched, I recently fell onto the following BUG when booting: [ 0.000000] ftrace: allocating 36610 entries in 144 pages [ 0.000000] Oops - illegal instruction [#1] [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.13.1+ #5 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: SiFive HiFive Unmatched A00 (DT) [ 0.000000] epc : riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] ra : __sbi_rfence_v02+0xc8/0x10a [ 0.000000] epc : ffffffff80007240 ra : ffffffff80009964 sp : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] gp : ffffffff81a1ea70 tp : ffffffff8180f500 t0 : ffffffe07fe30000 [ 0.000000] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffff81803e60 [ 0.000000] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ffffffff81a22238 a1 : ffffffff81803e10 [ 0.000000] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffff8000989c a7 : 0000000052464e43 [ 0.000000] s2 : ffffffff81a220c8 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.000000] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000200000100 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 0.000000] s8 : ffffffe07fe04040 s9 : ffffffff81a22c80 s10: 0000000000001000 [ 0.000000] s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000001 t4 : 0000000000000008 [ 0.000000] t5 : ffffffcf04000808 t6 : ffffffe3ffddf188 [ 0.000000] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000002 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80007240>] riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask+0x6/0xae [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80009474>] sbi_remote_fence_i+0x1e/0x26 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000b8f4>] flush_icache_all+0x12/0x1a [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000666c>] patch_text_nosync+0x26/0x32 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8000884e>] ftrace_init_nop+0x52/0x8c [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff800f051e>] ftrace_process_locs.isra.0+0x29c/0x360 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a0e3c6>] ftrace_init+0x80/0x130 [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a00f8c>] start_kernel+0x5c4/0x8f6 [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace f67eb9af4d8d492b ]--- [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! [ 0.000000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]--- While ftrace is looping over a list of addresses to patch, it always failed when patching the same function: riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask. Looking at the backtrace, the illegal instruction is encountered in this same function. However, patch_text_nosync, after patching the instructions, calls flush_icache_range. But looking at what happens in this function: flush_icache_range -> flush_icache_all -> sbi_remote_fence_i -> __sbi_rfence_v02 -> riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask The icache and dcache of the current cpu are never synchronized between the patching of riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask and calling this same function. So fix this by flushing the current cpu's icache before asking for the other cpus to do the same. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> Fixes: fab957c ("RISC-V: Atomic and Locking Code") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>

The Xen interrupt injection for event channels relies on accessing the guest's vcpu_info structure in __kvm_xen_has_interrupt(), through a gfn_to_hva_cache. This requires the srcu lock to be held, which is mostly the case except for this code path: [ 11.822877] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 11.822965] ----------------------------- [ 11.823013] include/linux/kvm_host.h:664 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 11.823131] [ 11.823131] other info that might help us debug this: [ 11.823131] [ 11.823196] [ 11.823196] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 11.823253] 1 lock held by dom:0/90: [ 11.823292] #0: ffff998956ec8118 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x85/0x680 [ 11.823379] [ 11.823379] stack backtrace: [ 11.823428] CPU: 2 PID: 90 Comm: dom:0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.4.34+ #5 [ 11.823496] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 11.823612] Call Trace: [ 11.823645] dump_stack+0x7a/0xa5 [ 11.823681] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xc5/0x100 [ 11.823726] __kvm_xen_has_interrupt+0x179/0x190 [ 11.823773] kvm_cpu_has_extint+0x6d/0x90 [ 11.823813] kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr+0xd/0x40 [ 11.823853] kvm_vcpu_ready_for_interrupt_injection+0x20/0x30 < post_kvm_run_save() inlined here > [ 11.823906] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x135/0x6a0 [ 11.823947] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x263/0x680 Fixes: 40da8cc ("KVM: x86/xen: Add event channel interrupt vector upcall") Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <606aaaf29fca3850a63aa4499826104e77a72346.camel@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

As a full union is always sent, ensure all bytes of the union are initialized with memset to avoid msan warnings of use of uninitialized memory. An example warning from the daemon test: Uninitialized bytes in __interceptor_write at offset 71 inside [0x7ffd98da6280, 72) ==11602==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x5597edccdbe4 in ion tools/lib/perf/lib.c:18:6 #1 0x5597edccdbe4 in writen tools/lib/perf/lib.c:47:9 #2 0x5597ed221d30 in send_cmd tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c:1376:22 #3 0x5597ed21b48c in cmd_daemon tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c #4 0x5597ed1d6b67 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #5 0x5597ed1d6036 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #6 0x5597ed1d6036 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #7 0x5597ed1d6036 in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value tools/lib/perf/lib.c:18:6 in ion Exiting Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210617055554.1917997-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Host crashes when pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for VFs with virtual buses. The virtual buses added to SR-IOV have bus->self set to NULL and host crashes due to this. PID: 4481 TASK: ffff89c6941b0000 CPU: 53 COMMAND: "bash" ... #3 [ffff9a9481713808] oops_end at ffffffffb9025cd6 #4 [ffff9a9481713828] page_fault_oops at ffffffffb906e417 #5 [ffff9a9481713888] exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9a0ad14 #6 [ffff9a94817138b0] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9c00ace [exception RIP: pcie_capability_read_dword+28] RIP: ffffffffb952fd5c RSP: ffff9a9481713960 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff89c6b1096000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff9a9481713990 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000080 R8: 0000000000000008 R9: ffff89c64341a2f8 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89c648bab000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff89c648bab0c8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffff9a9481713988] pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root at ffffffffb95359a6 #8 [ffff9a94817139c0] bnxt_qplib_determine_atomics at ffffffffc08c1a33 [bnxt_re] #9 [ffff9a94817139d0] bnxt_re_dev_init at ffffffffc08ba2d1 [bnxt_re] Per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.5.10, the AtomicOp Requester Enable bit in Device Control 2 is reserved for VFs. The PF value applies to all associated VFs. Return -EINVAL if pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for a VF. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1631354585-16597-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@broadcom.com Fixes: 35f5ace ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Enable global atomic ops if platform supports") Fixes: 430a236 ("PCI: Add pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()") Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com>

Patch series "Solve silent data loss caused by poisoned page cache (shmem/tmpfs)", v5. When discussing the patch that splits page cache THP in order to offline the poisoned page, Noaya mentioned there is a bigger problem [1] that prevents this from working since the page cache page will be truncated if uncorrectable errors happen. By looking this deeper it turns out this approach (truncating poisoned page) may incur silent data loss for all non-readonly filesystems if the page is dirty. It may be worse for in-memory filesystem, e.g. shmem/tmpfs since the data blocks are actually gone. To solve this problem we could keep the poisoned dirty page in page cache then notify the users on any later access, e.g. page fault, read/write, etc. The clean page could be truncated as is since they can be reread from disk later on. The consequence is the filesystems may find poisoned page and manipulate it as healthy page since all the filesystems actually don't check if the page is poisoned or not in all the relevant paths except page fault. In general, we need make the filesystems be aware of poisoned page before we could keep the poisoned page in page cache in order to solve the data loss problem. To make filesystems be aware of poisoned page we should consider: - The page should be not written back: clearing dirty flag could prevent from writeback. - The page should not be dropped (it shows as a clean page) by drop caches or other callers: the refcount pin from hwpoison could prevent from invalidating (called by cache drop, inode cache shrinking, etc), but it doesn't avoid invalidation in DIO path. - The page should be able to get truncated/hole punched/unlinked: it works as it is. - Notify users when the page is accessed, e.g. read/write, page fault and other paths (compression, encryption, etc). The scope of the last one is huge since almost all filesystems need do it once a page is returned from page cache lookup. There are a couple of options to do it: 1. Check hwpoison flag for every path, the most straightforward way. 2. Return NULL for poisoned page from page cache lookup, the most callsites check if NULL is returned, this should have least work I think. But the error handling in filesystems just return -ENOMEM, the error code will incur confusion to the users obviously. 3. To improve #2, we could return error pointer, e.g. ERR_PTR(-EIO), but this will involve significant amount of code change as well since all the paths need check if the pointer is ERR or not just like option #1. I did prototypes for both #1 and #3, but it seems #3 may require more changes than #1. For #3 ERR_PTR will be returned so all the callers need to check the return value otherwise invalid pointer may be dereferenced, but not all callers really care about the content of the page, for example, partial truncate which just sets the truncated range in one page to 0. So for such paths it needs additional modification if ERR_PTR is returned. And if the callers have their own way to handle the problematic pages we need to add a new FGP flag to tell FGP functions to return the pointer to the page. It may happen very rarely, but once it happens the consequence (data corruption) could be very bad and it is very hard to debug. It seems this problem had been slightly discussed before, but seems no action was taken at that time. [2] As the aforementioned investigation, it needs huge amount of work to solve the potential data loss for all filesystems. But it is much easier for in-memory filesystems and such filesystems actually suffer more than others since even the data blocks are gone due to truncating. So this patchset starts from shmem/tmpfs by taking option #1. TODO: * The unpoison has been broken since commit 0ed950d ("mm,hwpoison: make get_hwpoison_page() call get_any_page()"), and this patch series make refcount check for unpoisoning shmem page fail. * Expand to other filesystems. But I haven't heard feedback from filesystem developers yet. Patch breakdown: Patch #1: cleanup, depended by patch #2 Patch #2: fix THP with hwpoisoned subpage(s) PMD map bug Patch #3: coding style cleanup Patch #4: refactor and preparation. Patch #5: keep the poisoned page in page cache and handle such case for all the paths. Patch #6: the previous patches unblock page cache THP split, so this patch add page cache THP split support. This patch (of 4): A minor cleanup to the indent. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211020210755.23964-1-shy828301@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211020210755.23964-4-shy828301@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

After removing /dev/kmem, sanitizing /proc/kcore and handling /dev/mem, this series tackles the last sane way how a VM could accidentially access logically unplugged memory managed by a virtio-mem device: /proc/vmcore When dumping memory via "makedumpfile", PG_offline pages, used by virtio-mem to flag logically unplugged memory, are already properly excluded; however, especially when accessing/copying /proc/vmcore "the usual way", we can still end up reading logically unplugged memory part of a virtio-mem device. Patch #1-#3 are cleanups. Patch #4 extends the existing oldmem_pfn_is_ram mechanism. Patch #5-#7 are virtio-mem refactorings for patch #8, which implements the virtio-mem logic to query the state of device blocks. Patch #8: "Although virtio-mem currently supports reading unplugged memory in the hypervisor, this will change in the future, indicated to the device via a new feature flag. We similarly sanitized /proc/kcore access recently. [...] Distributions that support virtio-mem+kdump have to make sure that the virtio_mem module will be part of the kdump kernel or the kdump initrd; dracut was recently [2] extended to include virtio-mem in the generated initrd. As long as no special kdump kernels are used, this will automatically make sure that virtio-mem will be around in the kdump initrd and sanitize /proc/vmcore access -- with dracut" This is the last remaining bit to support VIRTIO_MEM_F_UNPLUGGED_INACCESSIBLE [3] in the Linux implementation of virtio-mem. Note: this is best-effort. We'll never be able to control what runs inside the second kernel, really, but we also don't have to care: we only care about sane setups where we don't want our VM getting zapped once we touch the wrong memory location while dumping. While we usually expect sane setups to use "makedumfile", nothing really speaks against just copying /proc/vmcore, especially in environments where HWpoisioning isn't typically expected. Also, we really don't want to put all our trust completely on the memmap, so sanitizing also makes sense when just using "makedumpfile". [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210526093041.8800-1-david@redhat.com [2] dracutdevs/dracut#1157 [3] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202109/msg00021.html This patch (of 9): The callback is only used for the vmcore nowadays. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211005121430.30136-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211005121430.30136-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrvsky@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "kcov: PREEMPT_RT fixup + misc", v2. The last patch in series is follow-up to address the PREEMPT_RT issue within in kcov reported by Clark [1]. Patches 1-3 are smaller things that I noticed while staring at it. Patch 4 is small change which makes replacement in #5 simpler / more obvious. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210809155909.333073de@theseus.lan This patch (of 5): The first example code has includes at the top, the following two example share that part. The last example (remote coverage collection) requires the linux/types.h header file due its __aligned_u64 usage. Add the linux/types.h to the top most example and a comment that the header files from above are required as it is done in the second example. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210923164741.1859522-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210830172627.267989-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210923164741.1859522-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It is generally unsafe to call put_device() with dpm_list_mtx held, because the given device's release routine may carry out an action depending on that lock which then may deadlock, so modify the system-wide suspend and resume of devices to always drop dpm_list_mtx before calling put_device() (and adjust white space somewhat while at it). For instance, this prevents the following splat from showing up in the kernel log after a system resume in certain configurations: [ 3290.969514] ====================================================== [ 3290.969517] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3290.969519] 5.15.0+ #2420 Tainted: G S [ 3290.969523] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3290.969525] systemd-sleep/4553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3290.969529] ffff888117ab1138 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.969554] but task is already holding lock: [ 3290.969556] ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.969571] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3290.969573] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3290.969575] -> #3 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969583] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969591] device_pm_add+0x2e/0xe0 [ 3290.969597] device_add+0x4d5/0x8f0 [ 3290.969605] hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x43/0xb0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969689] hci_conn_complete_evt.isra.71+0x124/0x750 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969747] hci_event_packet+0xd6c/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969798] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969842] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969851] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969859] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969865] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.969872] -> #2 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969881] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969887] hci_event_packet+0xba/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969935] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969978] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969985] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969993] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969999] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970004] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970013] process_one_work+0x27d/0x650 [ 3290.970020] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.970028] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.970033] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970038] -> #0 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970047] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970054] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970059] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970066] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970073] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970081] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970130] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970195] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970201] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970211] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970215] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970220] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970229] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970236] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970243] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970251] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970257] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970263] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970269] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970276] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970284] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3290.970285] Chain exists of: (wq_completion)hci0#2 --> &hdev->lock --> dpm_list_mtx [ 3290.970297] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3290.970299] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3290.970300] ---- ---- [ 3290.970302] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970306] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 3290.970310] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970314] lock((wq_completion)hci0#2); [ 3290.970319] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3290.970321] 7 locks held by systemd-sleep/4553: [ 3290.970325] #0: ffff888103bcd448 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970341] #1: ffff888115a14488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x103/0x1b0 [ 3290.970355] #2: ffff888100f719e0 (kn->active#233){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1b0 [ 3290.970369] #3: ffffffff82661048 (autosleep_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: state_store+0x12/0x90 [ 3290.970384] #4: ffffffff82658ac8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x9f/0x310 [ 3290.970399] #5: ffffffff827f2a48 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x4c/0x80 [ 3290.970416] #6: ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.970428] stack backtrace: [ 3290.970431] CPU: 3 PID: 4553 Comm: systemd-sleep Tainted: G S 5.15.0+ #2420 [ 3290.970438] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9380/0RYJWW, BIOS 1.5.0 06/03/2019 [ 3290.970441] Call Trace: [ 3290.970446] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57 [ 3290.970454] check_noncircular+0x105/0x120 [ 3290.970468] ? __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970474] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970487] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970493] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970503] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x3b/0x60 [ 3290.970510] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x58/0x240 [ 3290.970519] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970526] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970544] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970552] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970561] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970572] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970624] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970687] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970695] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970705] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970710] ? dpm_resume_early+0x251/0x3b0 [ 3290.970718] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970723] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970737] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970746] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970755] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970764] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970777] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970785] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970794] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970803] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970811] RIP: 0033:0x7f41b1328164 [ 3290.970819] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 4a d2 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [ 3290.970824] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6ae21b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 3290.970831] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f41b1328164 [ 3290.970836] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 000055965e651070 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970839] RBP: 000055965e651070 R08: 000055965e64f390 R09: 00007f41b1e3d1c0 [ 3290.970843] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970846] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000055965e64f2b0 R15: 0000000000000004 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Convert the netfs helper library to use folios throughout, convert the 9p and afs filesystems to use folios in their file I/O paths and convert the ceph filesystem to use just enough folios to compile. With these changes, afs passes -g quick xfstests. Changes ======= ver #5: - Got rid of folio_end{io,_read,_write}() and inlined the stuff it does instead (Willy decided he didn't want this after all). ver #4: - Fixed a bug in afs_redirty_page() whereby it didn't set the next page index in the loop and returned too early. - Simplified a check in v9fs_vfs_write_folio_locked()[1]. - Undid a change to afs_symlink_readpage()[1]. - Used offset_in_folio() in afs_write_end()[1]. - Changed from using page_endio() to folio_end{io,_read,_write}()[1]. ver #2: - Add 9p foliation. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> Tested-by: kafs-testing@auristor.com cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YYKa3bfQZxK5/wDN@casper.infradead.org/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2408234.1628687271@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162877311459.3085614.10601478228012245108.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162981153551.1901565.3124454657133703341.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163005745264.2472992.9852048135392188995.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163584187452.4023316.500389675405550116.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v3 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163649328026.309189.1124218109373941936.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v4 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163657852454.834781.9265101983152100556.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v5

The exit function fixes a memory leak with the src field as detected by leak sanitizer. An example of which is: Indirect leak of 25133184 byte(s) in 207 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f199ecfe987 in __interceptor_calloc libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x55defe638224 in annotated_source__alloc_histograms util/annotate.c:803 #2 0x55defe6397e4 in symbol__hists util/annotate.c:952 #3 0x55defe639908 in symbol__inc_addr_samples util/annotate.c:968 #4 0x55defe63aa29 in hist_entry__inc_addr_samples util/annotate.c:1119 #5 0x55defe499a79 in hist_iter__report_callback tools/perf/builtin-report.c:182 #6 0x55defe7a859d in hist_entry_iter__add util/hist.c:1236 #7 0x55defe49aa63 in process_sample_event tools/perf/builtin-report.c:315 #8 0x55defe731bc8 in evlist__deliver_sample util/session.c:1473 #9 0x55defe731e38 in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1510 #10 0x55defe732a23 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1590 #11 0x55defe72951e in ordered_events__deliver_event util/session.c:183 #12 0x55defe740082 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 #13 0x55defe7407cb in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 #14 0x55defe740a61 in ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:341 #15 0x55defe73837f in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2390 #16 0x55defe7385ff in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2420 ... Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211112035124.94327-3-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 5ec0a6f ] Host crashes when pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for VFs with virtual buses. The virtual buses added to SR-IOV have bus->self set to NULL and host crashes due to this. PID: 4481 TASK: ffff89c6941b0000 CPU: 53 COMMAND: "bash" ... #3 [ffff9a9481713808] oops_end at ffffffffb9025cd6 #4 [ffff9a9481713828] page_fault_oops at ffffffffb906e417 #5 [ffff9a9481713888] exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9a0ad14 #6 [ffff9a94817138b0] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9c00ace [exception RIP: pcie_capability_read_dword+28] RIP: ffffffffb952fd5c RSP: ffff9a9481713960 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff89c6b1096000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff9a9481713990 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000080 R8: 0000000000000008 R9: ffff89c64341a2f8 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89c648bab000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff89c648bab0c8 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffff9a9481713988] pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root at ffffffffb95359a6 #8 [ffff9a94817139c0] bnxt_qplib_determine_atomics at ffffffffc08c1a33 [bnxt_re] #9 [ffff9a94817139d0] bnxt_re_dev_init at ffffffffc08ba2d1 [bnxt_re] Per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.5.10, the AtomicOp Requester Enable bit in Device Control 2 is reserved for VFs. The PF value applies to all associated VFs. Return -EINVAL if pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is called for a VF. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1631354585-16597-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@broadcom.com Fixes: 35f5ace ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Enable global atomic ops if platform supports") Fixes: 430a236 ("PCI: Add pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()") Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 2aa3660 upstream. It is generally unsafe to call put_device() with dpm_list_mtx held, because the given device's release routine may carry out an action depending on that lock which then may deadlock, so modify the system-wide suspend and resume of devices to always drop dpm_list_mtx before calling put_device() (and adjust white space somewhat while at it). For instance, this prevents the following splat from showing up in the kernel log after a system resume in certain configurations: [ 3290.969514] ====================================================== [ 3290.969517] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3290.969519] 5.15.0+ #2420 Tainted: G S [ 3290.969523] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3290.969525] systemd-sleep/4553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3290.969529] ffff888117ab1138 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.969554] but task is already holding lock: [ 3290.969556] ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.969571] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3290.969573] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3290.969575] -> #3 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969583] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969591] device_pm_add+0x2e/0xe0 [ 3290.969597] device_add+0x4d5/0x8f0 [ 3290.969605] hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x43/0xb0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969689] hci_conn_complete_evt.isra.71+0x124/0x750 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969747] hci_event_packet+0xd6c/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969798] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969842] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969851] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969859] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969865] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.969872] -> #2 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969881] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969887] hci_event_packet+0xba/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969935] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969978] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969985] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969993] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969999] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970004] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970013] process_one_work+0x27d/0x650 [ 3290.970020] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.970028] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.970033] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970038] -> #0 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970047] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970054] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970059] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970066] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970073] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970081] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970130] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970195] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970201] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970211] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970215] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970220] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970229] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970236] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970243] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970251] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970257] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970263] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970269] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970276] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970284] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3290.970285] Chain exists of: (wq_completion)hci0#2 --> &hdev->lock --> dpm_list_mtx [ 3290.970297] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3290.970299] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3290.970300] ---- ---- [ 3290.970302] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970306] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 3290.970310] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970314] lock((wq_completion)hci0#2); [ 3290.970319] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3290.970321] 7 locks held by systemd-sleep/4553: [ 3290.970325] #0: ffff888103bcd448 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970341] #1: ffff888115a14488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x103/0x1b0 [ 3290.970355] #2: ffff888100f719e0 (kn->active#233){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1b0 [ 3290.970369] #3: ffffffff82661048 (autosleep_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: state_store+0x12/0x90 [ 3290.970384] #4: ffffffff82658ac8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x9f/0x310 [ 3290.970399] #5: ffffffff827f2a48 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x4c/0x80 [ 3290.970416] #6: ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.970428] stack backtrace: [ 3290.970431] CPU: 3 PID: 4553 Comm: systemd-sleep Tainted: G S 5.15.0+ #2420 [ 3290.970438] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9380/0RYJWW, BIOS 1.5.0 06/03/2019 [ 3290.970441] Call Trace: [ 3290.970446] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57 [ 3290.970454] check_noncircular+0x105/0x120 [ 3290.970468] ? __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970474] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970487] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970493] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970503] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x3b/0x60 [ 3290.970510] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x58/0x240 [ 3290.970519] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970526] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970544] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970552] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970561] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970572] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970624] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970687] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970695] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970705] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970710] ? dpm_resume_early+0x251/0x3b0 [ 3290.970718] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970723] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970737] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970746] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970755] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970764] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970777] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970785] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970794] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970803] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970811] RIP: 0033:0x7f41b1328164 [ 3290.970819] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 4a d2 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [ 3290.970824] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6ae21b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 3290.970831] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f41b1328164 [ 3290.970836] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 000055965e651070 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970839] RBP: 000055965e651070 R08: 000055965e64f390 R09: 00007f41b1e3d1c0 [ 3290.970843] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970846] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000055965e64f2b0 R15: 0000000000000004 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

When reading the voltage: $ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio\:device0/in_voltage0_raw Lockdep complains: [ 153.910616] ====================================================== [ 153.916918] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 153.923221] 5.14.0+ #5 Not tainted [ 153.926692] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 153.932992] cat/717 is trying to acquire lock: [ 153.937525] c2585358 (&indio_dev->mlock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iio_device_claim_direct_mode+0x28/0x44 [ 153.946541] but task is already holding lock: [ 153.952487] c2585860 (&dln2->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dln2_adc_read_raw+0x94/0x2bc [dln2_adc] [ 153.961152] which lock already depends on the new lock. Fix this by not calling into the iio core underneath the dln2->mutex lock. Fixes: 7c0299e ("iio: adc: Add support for DLN2 ADC") Cc: Jack Andersen <jackoalan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@tronnes.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018113731.25723-1-noralf@tronnes.org Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

With preemption enabled (CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y), the following appeared when rnbd client tries to map remote block device. BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/1733 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 CPU: 0 PID: 1733 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1 #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x78 dump_stack+0x10/0x12 check_preemption_disabled+0xe4/0xf0 debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 rtrs_clt_update_all_stats+0x3b/0x70 [rtrs_client] rtrs_clt_read_req+0xc3/0x380 [rtrs_client] ? rtrs_clt_init_req+0xe3/0x120 [rtrs_client] rtrs_clt_request+0x1a7/0x320 [rtrs_client] ? 0xffffffffc0ab1000 send_usr_msg+0xbf/0x160 [rnbd_client] ? rnbd_clt_put_sess+0x60/0x60 [rnbd_client] ? send_usr_msg+0x160/0x160 [rnbd_client] ? sg_alloc_table+0x27/0xb0 ? sg_zero_buffer+0xd0/0xd0 send_msg_sess_info+0xe9/0x180 [rnbd_client] ? rnbd_clt_put_sess+0x60/0x60 [rnbd_client] ? blk_mq_alloc_tag_set+0x2ef/0x370 rnbd_clt_map_device+0xba8/0xcd0 [rnbd_client] ? send_msg_open+0x200/0x200 [rnbd_client] rnbd_clt_map_device_store+0x3e5/0x620 [rnbd_client To supress the calltrace, let's call get_cpu_ptr/put_cpu_ptr pair in rtrs_clt_update_rdma_stats to disable preemption when accessing per-cpu variable. While at it, let's make the similar change in rtrs_clt_update_wc_stats. And for rtrs_clt_inc_failover_cnt, though it was only called inside rcu section, but it still can be preempted in case CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is enabled, so change it to {get,put}_cpu_ptr pair either. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211128133501.38710-1-guoqing.jiang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

When kmalloc in nfc_genl_dump_devices() fails then nfc_genl_dump_devices_done() segfaults as below KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] CPU: 0 PID: 25 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4-01180-g2a987e65025e-dirty #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-6.fc35 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work RIP: 0010:klist_iter_exit+0x26/0x80 Call Trace: <TASK> class_dev_iter_exit+0x15/0x20 nfc_genl_dump_devices_done+0x3b/0x50 genl_lock_done+0x84/0xd0 netlink_sock_destruct+0x8f/0x270 __sk_destruct+0x64/0x3b0 sk_destruct+0xa8/0xd0 __sk_free+0x2e8/0x3d0 sk_free+0x51/0x90 netlink_sock_destruct_work+0x1c/0x20 process_one_work+0x411/0x710 worker_thread+0x6fd/0xa80 Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=fc0fa5a53db9edd261d56e74325419faf18bd0df Reported-by: syzbot+f9f76f4a0766420b4a02@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211208182742.340542-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Tomand others added 17 commits May 12, 2021 11:55

drivers/i2c: Add GPIO configuration for VIC7100.
c844c03
[FIXME] why we can not do it in U-boot? [geert: Rebase to v5.13-rc1]

net: stmmac: Add dcache flush functions for JH7100
add5898
Note: including uSDK v0.9->v1.0 patch [geert: Rebase to v5.13-rc1] Warnings fixed by Matteo. Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@microsoft.com>

net: stmmac: Configure gtxclk based on speed
f600129

drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc: Add dcache flush(VIC7100 ONLY).
dd69e36

drivers/usb: Add dcache flush(VIC7100 ONLY)
69b0e4c
drivers/usb/cdns3/ drivers/usb/core/ drivers/usb/host/ include/linux/usb.h [geert: Rebase to v5.13-rc1]

riscv/starfive: Add VIC7100 support
1dc13a5

drivers/video/fbdev and drivers/media/platform: starfive drivers added
9db6958
1, add ov5640&sc2235 drivers, update stf_isp 2, add MIPI/CSI/DSI drivers for VIC7100

drivers/media and video: update fb driver(flush cache) and cam sensor…
c21a46e
… drivers

drivers/video/fbdev/starfive: workaround for unavailable pointer of dtb
bbf6200
Fix sf_fb_map_video_memory in starfive_fb.c

drivers/video/fbdev/starfive: fix compiler warnings
d4a5f23
Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

drivers/video/fbdev/starfive: improve error handling
165237a
Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

spi: cadence-quadspi: Allow compilation on RISC-V
98ee6b9
This IP is also used on the Starfive JH7100 riscv64 SoC and presumably also the upcoming JH7110 SoC. Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

power: reset: Add TPS65086 restart driver
247c817
Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>

drivers/video/fbdev/starfive: fix modpost build error (missing license)
a17d52a
Signed-off-by: Stephen L Arnold <nerdboy@gentoo.org>

sarnold force-pushed the module-fix branch from b629a69 to a17d52aCompare May 14, 2021 19:53

sarnold changed the title ~~Module fix and minmal SDK defconfig~~Module fix for starfive_fbMay 14, 2021

esmil force-pushed the starlight branch from 7cc838f to e6e90bdCompare May 14, 2021 20:01

esmil closed this May 14, 2021

sarnold deleted the module-fix branch May 16, 2021 00:03

Navigation Menu

Module fix for starfive_fb - #5

Module fix for starfive_fb#5
sarnold wants to merge 18 commits into
esmil:starlightfrom
VCTLabs:module-fix

sarnold commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

sarnold commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

esmil commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

sarnold commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

esmil commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Conversation

sarnold commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

sarnold commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

esmil commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

sarnold commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

esmil commented May 14, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants