[finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

Description

@claude

Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

#14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

  • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
  • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
  • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

  • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
  • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

  • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
  • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


Generated by Claude Code

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

    Description

    @claude

    Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

    #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

    Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

    • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
    • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
    • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

    Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

    • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
    • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

    Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

    • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
    • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

    Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

    Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

    Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


    Generated by Claude Code

    Activity

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

      Description

      @claude

      Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

      #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

      Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

      • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
      • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
      • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

      Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

      • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
      • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

      Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

      • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
      • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

      Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

      Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

      Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


      Generated by Claude Code

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

        Description

        @claude

        Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

        #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

        Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

        • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
        • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
        • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

        Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

        • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
        • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

        Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

        • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
        • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

        Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

        Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

        Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


        Generated by Claude Code

        Activity

        Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

          Description

          @claude

          Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

          #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

          Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

          • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
          • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
          • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

          Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

          • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
          • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

          Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

          • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
          • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

          Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

          Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

          Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


          Generated by Claude Code

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

            Description

            @claude

            Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

            #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

            Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

            • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
            • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
            • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

            Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

            • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
            • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

            Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

            • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
            • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

            Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

            Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

            Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


            Generated by Claude Code

            Activity

            Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

              Description

              @claude

              Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

              #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

              Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

              • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
              • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
              • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

              Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

              • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
              • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

              Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

              • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
              • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

              Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

              Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

              Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


              Generated by Claude Code

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                [finding] five more private suggest/distance ("Did you mean?") copies remain in packages/lint after #14268 consolidated the ruled three #14577

                Description

                @claude

                Follow-up to #14268 (PR #14575), filed by the domain:devx execution seat (session session_01WLJQhde67SeTccsmnBVarV, seat post #6023) from that card's out_of_scope_findings; unassigned, for triage.

                #14268's ruling named THREE rules; after PR #14575 those three (validate-object-references.ts, validate-sortable-fields.ts, validate-widget-bindings.ts) import suggestName / nearestName from object-graph.ts, which now carries the one shared "Did you mean?" helper (containment pre-pass, then edit distance with budget max(2, floor(len/3))). The consolidation stopped at the ruling's three, but packages/lint/src still carries five more private copies of the same suggest + distance pair and two deliberately different neighbours. Line numbers below are on origin/mainf60ab90ae (pre-#14575 merge; the file:line for these files do not move with that PR).

                Tier 1 — byte-for-byte the same shape as the three just consolidated (same Levenshtein, same budget, same message shape). Pure rewire to suggestName, delete the copy:

                • validate-action-name-refs.ts:84distance, :101suggest (budget at :111)
                • validate-chart-bindings.ts:83distance, :100suggest (budget at :110)
                • validate-searchable-fields.ts:289distance, :275suggest (budget at :285)

                Tier 2 — same budget + message, plus a one-line pre-pass that should stay in the rule and wrap the shared helper (prefix/namespace check first, then suggestName):

                • validate-ai-tool-references.ts:70distance, :87suggest:93 first tries known.has(prefix + target) (a missing tool-name prefix), then the same Levenshtein budget (:105-106).
                • validate-translation-references.ts:159distance, :186suggest:191 first tries a namespace-segment match, then the same budget (:202-203).

                Not the same thing — listed so the follow-up does not over-reach; leave them unless triage rules otherwise:

                • validate-react-page-props.ts:167nearestKnown — fixed budget <= 2 (not max(2, floor(len/3))), null return, own editDistance. Same idea, different contract; consolidating changes which typos get a hint.
                • validate-rule-schema-formats.ts:266nearestRegisteredFormat — exported, budget min(3, floor(len/2)), case-insensitive on the authored side, alphabetical tie-break "so the suggestion is stable", with its own docblock justifying each choice against ajv's case-sensitive lookup. A different helper on purpose.

                Why it matters (same argument as #14268): the containment pre-pass is now the shared helper's behaviour for every caller, so the five Tier 1/2 rules once again give "a different quality of hint depending on which rule you tripped" — amountsum_amount is suggested by widget bindings and not by chart bindings, one file over. That is the drift #14268 was opened to end.

                Suggested shape if promoted:pm:queue, one PR, @objectstack/lintpatch changeset; Tier 1 rewire + Tier 2 wrap; ⛔ no change to object-graph.ts's helper (already ruled in #14268); ⛔ validate-react-page-props.ts and validate-rule-schema-formats.ts out of scope unless triage says otherwise. Serial: after PR #14575 lands (it is in CI now); no other open PR touches these five files at filing time.

                Dedup: no open issue matches did you mean / suggest / levenshtein / nearest in its title except #14268 itself (481 open issues scanned 12:5xZ).


                Generated by Claude Code

                Activity

                Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions