Skip to content

✨ Move the e2e into the operator-controler-system ns - #927

Merged
tmshort merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:mainfrom
tmshort:move-e2e
Jun 12, 2024
Merged

✨ Move the e2e into the operator-controler-system ns#927
tmshort merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:mainfrom
tmshort:move-e2e

Conversation

@tmshort

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

To allow access to the docker-registry certificate, move the e2e resources into the same namespace as the operator-controller-system namespace.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

To allow access to the docker-registry certificate, move the e2e
resources into the same namespace as the operator-controller-system
namespace.
Signed-off-by: Todd Short <tshort@redhat.com>
@tmshort
tmshort requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 12, 2024 15:12
@netlify

netlifyBot commented Jun 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commitdfd8786
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/6669bae440e2bf0008f4803b
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-927--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.38%. Comparing base (66a063b) to head (dfd8786).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #927 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 77.38% 77.38% =======================================
Files 17 17 Lines 1163 1163 =======================================
Hits 900 900 Misses 183 183 Partials 80 80 
FlagCoverage Δ
e2e57.17% <ø> (ø)
unit50.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@varshaprasad96varshaprasad96 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ciopenshift-ciBot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2024
@tmshort
tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit aa48e70Jun 12, 2024
@tmshort
tmshort deleted the move-e2e branch June 12, 2024 19:47
tmshort added a commit to tmshort/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
…framework#927)"
This ends up overwriting the security policy of the operator-controller-system
namespace, which really isn't something we want to do in a valid e2e test.
Many of the e2e components need to run as root in order to do the things
they need to do.
This reverts commit aa48e70.
github-merge-queueBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
)
This ends up overwriting the security policy of the operator-controller-system
namespace, which really isn't something we want to do in a valid e2e test.
Many of the e2e components need to run as root in order to do the things
they need to do.
This reverts commit aa48e70.
@skattojuskattoju mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtmIndicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tmshort@varshaprasad96