Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Remove events by alexcjohnson · Pull Request #89 · plotly/dash-html-components · GitHub
Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove events - #89

Merged
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events
Jan 15, 2019
Merged

Remove events#89
alexcjohnson merged 15 commits into
masterfrom
no-events

Conversation

@alexcjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes#88
Pretty simple in this repo - components already have n_clicks matching the click event, the only one provided here, so there's really no concern about removing it. Note that rebuilding was done using an updated version of dash, in its own no-events branch (which I haven't published yet). But I did a few other little things while I was in here:

  • Added a shortcut to run the tests from npm run test173510e - unless I'm missing something and there already is an easy way to run them all?
  • There were lots of duplicates in elements.txt - I sorted and deduped them 2f873da
  • A little linting

Comment threadpackage.json Outdated
"build:all": "npm run build:js && npm run build:js-dev && npm run build:py",
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src"
"build:watch": "watch 'npm run build:all' src",
"test": "python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components && python -m unittest tests.test_integration && python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update the circleci config to also use this.

python -m unittest tests.test_dash_html_components

.readFileSync(listPath, 'utf8')
.split('\n')
.filter(item => !!item);
.filter(item => Boolean(item));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While at it, please add the npm run lint command to the CI Build step

@Marc-Andre-RivetMarc-Andre-Rivet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small tweaks, otherwise lgtm

@Marc-Andre-Rivet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please create the master -> release-v1 merge after this.

Comment thread.circleci/config.yml Outdated
python -m unittest tests.test_integration
python -m unittest tests.test_dash_import
npm run test
npm run lint

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd do the opposite and have linting run as early as possible (before npm run clean), to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or in this case, I guess the .js files are also generated -- so after the generation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to prevent executing a long-ish build and tests for nothing.

I could move it, but I wouldn't want linter errors to prevent running the rest of the tests. The tests aren't that expensive, seems to me it's worth knowing about all failures together. Personally linter errors are about the last thing I deal with - in the unusual case that they're not caught automatically by my editor, forcing me to fix them right away.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough for the ordering. I had scenarios like the table where running the tests takes up to 15 minutes :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I don't think you'll get all the errors as-is. If tests fail, the job will terminate before linting happens. You would need a job for tests and one for linting to always get both sources of failure.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Looks like we need a set +e perhaps? Personally I'd rather get all the errors even in cases where the tests take 15 minutes...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! That should also work.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, my bash-fu is not the best, but I couldn't find a straight shell solution that worked the way I wanted... everything I tried either stopped on first failure or ignored errors if something later passed. npm-run-all and its run-s command (with the -c option) behaves the way I wanted, running everything no matter what, and reporting an error from any part.

@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson merged commit 89a6d67 into masterJan 15, 2019
@alexcjohnson
alexcjohnson deleted the no-events branch January 15, 2019 16:08
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@alexcjohnson@Marc-Andre-Rivet