Skip to content

Disable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesign - #147263

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
jieyouxu:disable-auto-backport-nominations
Oct 3, 2025
Merged

Disable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesign#147263
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
jieyouxu:disable-auto-backport-nominations

Conversation

@jieyouxu

@jieyouxujieyouxu commented Oct 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Current auto compiler stable-regression backport nominations seem to be too aggressive, and seems to unfortunately lower signal-to-noise ratio of the compiler backport channel. So this PR disables the triagebot compiler auto stable-regression backport nominations pending a redesign. Beta-regression auto backport nominations are not modified, we might want to gather some more experience with it.

No prejudice against re-enabling them if the nominations include a bit more context on why it's automatically nominated and which regression(s) are being addressed. Or as proposed, it could also simply become a reminder-to-nominate comment.

cf. #t-compiler/backports > #146919: stable-nominated @ 💬

I like the idea of rustbot just posting a message that suggests adding the label. That seems like a good compromise between avoiding forgotten nominations and avoiding spurious nominations.

In any case, this was very much worth experimenting!

r? @apiraino (or triagebot)

@rustbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

triagebot.toml has been modified, there may have been changes to the review queue.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

@rustbotrustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 2, 2025

@apirainoapiraino left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm ok with disabling both stable and beta auto-nominations but I understood from that thread that stable auto-nominations were too eager

View changes since this review

No prejudice against re-enabling them if the nominations include a bit
more context on _why_ it's automatically nominated and _which_
regression(s) are being addressed. Or as proposed, it could also simply
become a reminder-to-nominate _comment_.
@jieyouxu
jieyouxuforce-pushed the disable-auto-backport-nominations branch from f7f9846 to 16cfde9CompareOctober 2, 2025 09:22
@jieyouxujieyouxu changed the title Disable triagebot auto compiler backport nominations pending redesignDisable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesignOct 2, 2025
@jieyouxu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Modified to only disable the stable auto backport nominations, since stable backports have a substantially higher bar, which makes those very prone to false positives.

@jieyouxu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

(Also this is r-l/r so you'll need to bors 😁)

@Urgau

Urgau commented Oct 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r=apiraino,Urgau

@bors

bors commented Oct 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 16cfde9 has been approved by apiraino,Urgau

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@borsbors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 2, 2025
@Urgau

Urgau commented Oct 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors rollup

@ZalatharZalathar mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #141839 (make rust-analyzer use a dedicated build directory)
- #146166 (Implement range support in `//@ edition`)
- #147259 (cg_llvm: Use helper methods for all calls to `LLVMMDNodeInContext2`)
- #147263 (Disable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesign)
- #147268 (add arm-maintainers to various targets)
- #147270 (Move doc_cfg-specific code into `cfg.rs`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
bors merged commit 179d182 into rust-lang:masterOct 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbotrustbot added this to the 1.92.0 milestone Oct 3, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
Rollup merge of #147263 - jieyouxu:disable-auto-backport-nominations, r=apiraino,Urgau
Disable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesign
Current auto compiler stable-regression backport nominations seem to be too aggressive, and seems to unfortunately lower signal-to-noise ratio of the compiler backport channel. So this PR disables the triagebot compiler auto stable-regression backport nominations pending a redesign. Beta-regression auto backport nominations are not modified, we might want to gather some more experience with it.
No prejudice against re-enabling them if the nominations include a bit more context on _why_ it's automatically nominated and _which_ regression(s) are being addressed. Or as proposed, it could also simply become a reminder-to-nominate _comment_.
cf. [#t-compiler/backports > #146919: stable-nominated @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/474880-t-compiler.2Fbackports/topic/.23146919.3A.20stable-nominated/near/540979327)
> I like the idea of rustbot just posting a message that suggests adding the label. That seems like a good compromise between avoiding forgotten nominations and avoiding spurious nominations.
In any case, this was very much worth experimenting!
r? `@apiraino` (or triagebot)
@jieyouxu
jieyouxu deleted the disable-auto-backport-nominations branch October 3, 2025 04:47
github-actionsBot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141839 (make rust-analyzer use a dedicated build directory)
- rust-lang/rust#146166 (Implement range support in `//@ edition`)
- rust-lang/rust#147259 (cg_llvm: Use helper methods for all calls to `LLVMMDNodeInContext2`)
- rust-lang/rust#147263 (Disable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesign)
- rust-lang/rust#147268 (add arm-maintainers to various targets)
- rust-lang/rust#147270 (Move doc_cfg-specific code into `cfg.rs`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…, r=Kobzol
Update t-compiler beta nomination Zulip msg
Sister patch of [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)
Follow-up to rust-lang#147263
The triagebot now triggers a different message when a PR is nominated for backport, making it look like more a suggestion to evaluate for the author/reviewers than a mandatory decision for the team to take.
The wording (as per [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)) is open to suggestions.
Thanks
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Rollup merge of #147527 - apiraino:update-beta-nom-zulip-msg, r=Kobzol
Update t-compiler beta nomination Zulip msg
Sister patch of [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)
Follow-up to #147263
The triagebot now triggers a different message when a PR is nominated for backport, making it look like more a suggestion to evaluate for the author/reviewers than a mandatory decision for the team to take.
The wording (as per [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)) is open to suggestions.
Thanks
github-actionsBot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Update t-compiler beta nomination Zulip msg
Sister patch of [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)
Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#147263
The triagebot now triggers a different message when a PR is nominated for backport, making it look like more a suggestion to evaluate for the author/reviewers than a mandatory decision for the team to take.
The wording (as per [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)) is open to suggestions.
Thanks
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2025
Update t-compiler beta nomination Zulip msg
Sister patch of [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)
Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#147263
The triagebot now triggers a different message when a PR is nominated for backport, making it look like more a suggestion to evaluate for the author/reviewers than a mandatory decision for the team to take.
The wording (as per [triagebot#2191](rust-lang/triagebot#2191)) is open to suggestions.
Thanks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-metaArea: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itselfS-waiting-on-borsStatus: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@jieyouxu@rustbot@Urgau@bors@apiraino