Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix compile_fail tag - #33793
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not clear on why we're ignoring these
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It shouldn't. Thanks for noticing!
steveklabnik
commented
May 23, 2016
So, this patch seems sensible, but because of the lack of description, it took me a while to figure out exactly what it was doing, and what the problem is. Could you maybe amend the commit message to describe exactly what's going on here, and squash? Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this reads better having the panic + closure in a variable and then later matching the variable rather than doing both at once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess it's a question of point of view? For me it's better this way but if someone else agrees with you, then I'll do it again in two steps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure, personally. I can see it both ways.
GuillaumeGomez
commented
May 23, 2016
@steveklabnik: I splitted the two commits to make the review easier. I guess it wasn't a good idea. So just in case, the first commit was to fix cases where the compilation went fine when it was expecting that it'd fail. Second case just update the cases where it now fails because of this change. |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
May 24, 2016
Ok, so now commits have been squashed and commit message has been rewritten. It just remains the little syntax issue @jonathandturner reported (but I need another confirmation before removing it). |
steveklabnik
commented
May 24, 2016
@bors: r+ rollup |
bors
commented
May 24, 2016
📌 Commit 44e9ae0 has been approved by |
steveklabnik
commented
May 24, 2016
@bors: rollup- |
bors
commented
May 25, 2016
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #33833) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
May 25, 2016
@bors: r=steveklabnik |
bors
commented
May 25, 2016
📌 Commit 7a5bf59 has been approved by |
bors
commented
May 26, 2016
⌛ Testing commit 7a5bf59 with merge 4572819... |
…expected to and was still considered 'ok') * Fix error explanations tests/tags
bors
commented
May 26, 2016
💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-opt-rustbuild |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
May 27, 2016
Updated. |
steveklabnik
commented
May 27, 2016
@bors: r+ rollup |
bors
commented
May 27, 2016
📌 Commit abe9961 has been approved by |
bors
commented
May 29, 2016
⌛ Testing commit abe9961 with merge cac25b7... |
bors
commented
May 29, 2016
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt-rustbuild |
@bors: r+ rollup |
bors
commented
May 29, 2016
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
bors
commented
May 29, 2016
📌 Commit abe9961 has been approved by |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
May 29, 2016
@bors: retry |
…laumeGomez Fix compile_fail tag Fixesrust-lang#33780 r? @steveklabnik
…laumeGomez Fix compile_fail tag Fixesrust-lang#33780 r? @steveklabnik
bors
commented
May 30, 2016
⌛ Testing commit abe9961 with merge e73aba1... |
bors
commented
May 30, 2016
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-cross-netbsd |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
May 30, 2016
@bors: retry |
bors
commented
May 30, 2016
⌛ Testing commit abe9961 with merge 623cb7a... |
…laumeGomez Fix compile_fail tag Fixesrust-lang#33780 r? @steveklabnik
bors
commented
May 30, 2016
⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request. |
bors
commented
May 30, 2016
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #33959) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Fixes#33780
r? @steveklabnik