Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
librustdoc refactoring and cleanup. - #36729
Conversation
Doesn't look like it's used anywhere outside the module.
Now that each pass has its own module, there's not much of a reason to keep these structs within the functions.
frewsxcv
commented
Sep 25, 2016
rust-highfive
commented
Sep 25, 2016
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Sep 25, 2016
Wo nice! 👍 for me but I'll let the last words to @alexcrichton. |
alexcrichton
commented
Sep 26, 2016
bors
commented
Sep 26, 2016
📌 Commit 99e1b9c has been approved by |
librustdoc refactoring and cleanup. See each commit for more information. Biggest changes here is the addition of a `passes` module and each pass now lives in its own submodule.
See each commit for more information. Biggest changes here is the addition of a
passesmodule and each pass now lives in its own submodule.