Skip to content

normalize tuple pair types in trans - #37110

Closed
TimNN wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
TimNN:fix-37109
Closed

normalize tuple pair types in trans#37110
TimNN wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
TimNN:fix-37109

Conversation

@TimNN

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes#37109.

Note that #37109 is a regression from stable to stable, beta and nightly.

@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @Aatch

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@eddyb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors

bors commented Oct 12, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 7badc32 has been approved by eddyb

@eddybeddyb added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Oct 12, 2016
@arielb1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why are we passing a non-normalized tuple around anyway?

@eddyb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Oh for some reason I thought this had soemthing to do with tuple structs, oops. Yeah that is interesting, makes this only a bandaid.

@arielb1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have a better fix.

@arielb1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r-

@TimNNTimNN closed this Oct 12, 2016
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2016
normalize tuple pair types in trans
Fixesrust-lang#37109.
Note that rust-lang#37109 is a regression from stable to stable, beta and nightly.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2016
@brson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It's not clear that this should be backported to beta, or that #37129 should instead.

@brsonbrson removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Oct 14, 2016
@TimNN
TimNN deleted the fix-37109 branch April 7, 2017 20:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@TimNN@rust-highfive@eddyb@bors@arielb1@brson@Aatch