Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fixes #39661 - #39662
Conversation
Clarified potential ambiguity.
rust-highfive
commented
Feb 8, 2017
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @BurntSushi (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
steveklabnik
commented
Feb 8, 2017
Looks great! Thank you so much! @bors: r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Feb 8, 2017
📌 Commit 51ef003 has been approved by |
euclio
commented
Feb 9, 2017
Hm, I think there should be an article before "map". |
Henning-K
commented
Feb 9, 2017
@euclio Ah, missed that. How about "a"? |
Fixesrust-lang#39661 Clarifies the potential ambiguity.
frewsxcv
commented
Feb 12, 2017
Looks good, thanks for your contribution! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
commented
Feb 12, 2017
📌 Commit 8251a2d has been approved by |
Fixesrust-lang#39661 Clarifies the potential ambiguity.
Clarifies the potential ambiguity.