[beta] Beta next by brson · Pull Request #40401 · rust-lang/rust

brson · 2017-03-09T21:44:19Z

ADTs are translated in-place from rustc_trans::callee, so no trans-items are needed. This fix will be superseded by the shimmir branch, but I prefer not to backport that to beta. Fixesrust-lang#39823.

…put.

alexcrichton · 2017-03-09T22:28:06Z

@bors: r+ p=1000

This is going probably bounce a few times...

bors · 2017-03-09T22:28:07Z

📌 Commit a0a352d has been approved by alexcrichton

bors · 2017-03-09T23:37:23Z

⌛ Testing commit a0a352d with merge 94dca9a...

@alexcrichton

Beta next - #40285 - #40272 - #40064 - #39835 - #40398 r? @alexcrichton

bors · 2017-03-10T01:05:16Z

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

alexcrichton · 2017-03-10T04:31:58Z

@bors: retry * appveyor s3 failure #39074

…

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:05 PM, bors ***@***.***> wrote: 💔 Test failed - status-appveyor <https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2301> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#40401 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95AjpwOZ0eqdcWqTQd-OSyTNBgEzbks5rkKHOgaJpZM4MYrGN> .

bors · 2017-03-10T05:05:19Z

⌛ Testing commit a0a352d with merge 86dbd8e...

bors · 2017-03-10T06:37:00Z

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

alexcrichton · 2017-03-10T15:05:59Z

@bors: retry

s3 appveyor upload failure Failure to upload to S3 from AppVeyor #39074

bors · 2017-03-10T15:35:09Z

⌛ Testing commit a0a352d with merge 2401b92...

bors · 2017-03-10T15:38:41Z

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

alexcrichton · 2017-03-10T15:54:17Z

@bors: retry * appveyor network error

…

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:38 AM, bors ***@***.***> wrote: 💔 Test failed - status-appveyor <https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rust-lang/rust/build/1.0.2311> — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#40401 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD95JdntHPnwyzAKjAEnEgQ6FsqxhsUks5rkW6DgaJpZM4MYrGN> .

bors · 2017-03-10T16:11:01Z

⌛ Testing commit a0a352d with merge 33917a2...

bors · 2017-03-10T17:42:05Z

💔 Test failed - status-travis

arielb1 · 2017-03-10T17:45:49Z

OSX linker segfaulting on Travis #38878

@bors retry

brson · 2017-03-10T18:12:10Z

@bors r+ p=100

bors · 2017-03-10T18:12:11Z

📌 Commit eac7c8e has been approved by brson

brson · 2017-03-10T18:19:22Z

Not trying to land this via bors now. Just trying to get travis and appveyor to do a test against the pr.

alexcrichton · 2017-03-10T21:09:29Z

AppVeyor gives a clean bill of health

alexcrichton · 2017-03-10T22:10:07Z

Travis gives a clean bill of health except for OSX.

The OSX failures are, however, all spurious.

brsonand others added 7 commits March 9, 2017 21:38

Release notes for 1.16
91c8162

Fix ICE: don't use struct_variant on enums
3f45364
Fixrust-lang#40221 and add unittest.

Fix const expression macro invocations.
636299a

trans: don't ICE when trying to create ADT trans-items
d735d95
ADTs are translated in-place from rustc_trans::callee, so no trans-items are needed. This fix will be superseded by the shimmir branch, but I prefer not to backport that to beta. Fixesrust-lang#39823.

Bump prerelease version
64a3b62

Rename expected_types_for_fn_args to expected_inputs_for_expected_out…
46928b8
…put.

Propagate expected type hints through struct literals.
a0a352d

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2017
Auto merge of#40401- brson:beta-next, r=alexcrichton
94dca9a
Beta next - #40285 - #40272 - #40064 - #39835 - #40398 r? @alexcrichton

nrc assigned alexcrichton Mar 10, 2017

alexcrichton changed the title ~~Beta next~~[beta] Beta nextMar 10, 2017

Fixrust-lang#39390on beta.
eac7c8e

brson mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2017
[beta] macro: fix issue with sequence repetitions on beta #40411
Closed

Enable builds against prs
5599636

brson force-pushed the beta-next branch from f3ed1b0 to 5599636Compare March 10, 2017 18:18

brson merged commit 690a4f6 into rust-lang:betaMar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

brson commented Mar 9, 2017• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented Mar 9, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 9, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 9, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented Mar 10, 2017 via email

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented Mar 10, 2017 via email

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

arielb1 commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

brson commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

brson commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented Mar 10, 2017

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

brson commented Mar 9, 2017•
edited
Loading