Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add doc examples for OsStr, OsString. - #40458
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The rust annotation is useless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The API documentation conventions don't mention that we have to remove these annotations.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1574-more-api-documentation-conventions.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed the annotations in a lot of places, so please don't add them back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Latest force push removes them.
I removed the annotations in a lot of places, so please don't add them back.
Sure, but just because you removed the annotations doesn't mean we should enforce this everywhere. Personally, I prefer to leave in the rust annotation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might be worth to start an official statement about this with @rust-lang/docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought that the RFC stated to not use them more strongly, but apparently it does not.
frewsxcv
commented
Mar 14, 2017
Comments have been addressed. |
frewsxcv
commented
Mar 14, 2017
@GuillaumeGomez Everything look good here? |
bors
commented
Mar 15, 2017
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40009) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
GuillaumeGomez
commented
Mar 15, 2017
r=me once conflicts fixed. |
frewsxcv
commented
Mar 17, 2017
@bors r=GuillaumeGomez rollup |
bors
commented
Mar 17, 2017
📌 Commit bc6eecd has been approved by |
…eGomez Add doc examples for `OsStr`, `OsString`. None
…eGomez Add doc examples for `OsStr`, `OsString`. None
…eGomez Add doc examples for `OsStr`, `OsString`. None
No description provided.